The only thing honest about Hillary's memoir, that would be the entire production, start to finish. . .from receipt of cash advance to Hill's royalties and anyone elses through distortions and outrightlies of PR and Marketing;. . .
. . . is that it has been a sham; a lie perpetrated against the public for personal gain.
Is there not at least a 'moral comparison' between this book; and the very least of what Martha Stewart is accused of? . . .and maybe what Sam Waxsal is guilty of?
I take it the same as some WWF promo. It's fake, everyone knows it's fake, but they have fun with it.
Consider these moral implications - a so-called wife has to write a book about their cheating so-called spouse in order to clear up why she accepts and allows the cheating. Meanwhile, there is no end in sight for the lying and infidelity. It's all done so they both can advance in power and status.
Doesn't really say a whole lot about either of them...