No, he did not. That is not what the agreement states. It has been posted elsewhere, if not on this thread.
Well, the DA was ready to indict him for obstruction of justice, and O'Brien admitted to moving priests, even though he knew they were guilty of pederasty, and did not inform pastors or parishioners of the receiving parishes.
And, when O'Brien came out and said "there was no cover-up," DA Romley, when questioned about it, said "Does the bishop not remember what he signed?"
Totus, you can spin the agreement however you want to spin it, but the only reason O'Brien wasn't behind bars for that offense was the DA worked out a deal with him.