To: Antoninus
I've been trashing Mahoney for three days, for his caustic "last straw" remarks against Keating! I didn't see you on any of THOSE threads.
Mahoney's a stonewalling, money-wasting clown. He's got that Liberace look, with the long fingers and swishing movements, that tells everybody where he's coming from.
Egan and Mahoney are the single two worst bishops in the American Church. They've got lots of skeletons, and they're both gay themselves.
To: sinkspur
Egan and Mahoney are the single two worst bishops in the American Church. They've got lots of skeletons, and they're both gay themselves. It's about time somebody said it instead of just hinting at it!
In fact, you can add Cardinal Law to the list. He wouldn't have been so anxious to cover up unless he was homosexual himself.
Now, who in the press or law enforcement is going to come up with the evidence that we have at least three queer cardinals in the USA?
220 posted on
06/16/2003 7:06:28 PM PDT by
Loyalist
(Keeper of the Schismatic Orc Ping List. Freepmail me if you want on or off it.)
To: sinkspur
I have heard that Egan has kind of lost the support of the pro-lifers because of his weak stand. I also know that Mahoney protects and fraternizes with homosexual and other sexual predators. Where is the documentation that they are homosexuals?
If it's around it should be publicized and be part of the reason that all lay Catholics should raise up and demand that homosexuals not be ordained.It also should be used in fighting the horrible sex education classes they are forcing on Catholic children.I believe there is even more to this than sexual preference even though I am convinced that homosexuality is the "tie that binds" beyond ethnicity,race,sex,political party and/birth family.
To: sinkspur
Much as I hate to say it, Mahony has a point here. Keating has been mouthing off too much. He needed to speak softly and carry a big stick.
The problem for Mahony is that the CA legislature passed a horrible law last year. It removed the statute of limitations on all sex abuse cases for a period of one year (2003). So, anyone can come forward and file a lawsuit regardless of how long ago the claimed abuse occured. What Mahony and the other Bishops in CA should have done was gone to Gray DAvis and pressured him to veto the bill or else. But once again, the same chickenshits who wouldn't throw the deviant priests out of the parishes, wouldn't put pressure on Davis to veto this anti-Catholic left wing Demo hit.
As a result, lots of new lawsuits are coming down the track going back 30 or so years. How do you defend against that? How do you separate the real from the imagined? Mahony did not want to gather and supply Keating with certain requested info because that could have been used by plaintiffs attorneys to bring more lawsuits during this year that the statute of limitations has been suspended.
I am all for showing Mahony the door, always have been since he was appointed archbishop. But in this case, I believe Keating screwed up.
253 posted on
06/16/2003 8:31:22 PM PDT by
CdMGuy
To: sinkspur
"The queen protesteth too much, methinks."
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson