Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tpaine
Under the provisions of the Judiciary Act of 1789, the marshal for the judicial district in which the Supreme Court of the United States sat was also responsible for serving that court. A statute of 1867 authorized the Supreme Court to appoint its own marshal.
45 posted on 06/16/2003 10:10:42 PM PDT by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: Consort

Under the provisions of the Judiciary Act of 1789, the marshal for the judicial district in which the Supreme Court of the United States sat was also responsible for serving that court. A statute of 1867 authorized the Supreme Court to appoint its own marshal.
-con-


Any state could refuse to allow a federal marshal to arrest one of its citizens on any number of pretexts, -- throwing the whole process back to the courts..


52 posted on 06/16/2003 10:37:02 PM PDT by tpaine (Really, I'm trying to be a 'decent human being', but me flesh is weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson