To: John Jorsett; dansangel
If I do not break the law and I stay within the limits of safety then I have no reason to be against this data that is being taken..
6 posted on
06/16/2003 9:17:55 AM PDT by
.45MAN
(If you don't like it here try and find a better country, Please!!)
To: .45MAN
"If I do not break the law and I stay within the limits of safety then I have no reason to be against this data that is being taken.."
Yeah, hey if you don't have anything to hide....
The cops will be coming by your house later on today, just to have a look around. You'll let them in, right, 'cause you don't have anything to hide...
This "surveillance state" that we're living in is starting to bug me... No pun intended!
8 posted on
06/16/2003 9:23:44 AM PDT by
Henrietta
To: .45MAN
And if you have nothing to hide, it's ok for the local police to search your house?
9 posted on
06/16/2003 9:25:00 AM PDT by
greydog
To: .45MAN
If I do not break the law and I stay within the limits of safety then I have no reason to be against this data that is being taken.. The problem I see is this: inevitably, the "limits of safety" will be cranked down until everyone's a violator. Red light cameras started as a great idea; now they are turning into devices to eliminate the yellow cycle. There is now a movement toward a new DUI standard of .05
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson