Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

X Prize Rejects Gravity Control Rocket Group
space.com ^ | 16 Jun 03 | Leonard David

Posted on 06/16/2003 8:55:41 AM PDT by RightWhale

X Prize Rejects Gravity Control Rocket Group

By Leonard David Senior Space Writer

posted: 05:30 pm ET 15 June 2003

It was a weighty decision, not taken lightly, but X Prize officials voted last week to bar a group attempting to harness gravity from entering the contest aimed at promoting space tourism. The X Prize Foundation notified Gravity Control Technologies (GCT) of Budapest, Hungary that its application to become an X Prize team had not been accepted.

GCT was founded in 1999 and is a privately held aerospace research firm delving into superconductivity and Zero Point Energy Field physics in the hopes of achieving one-hundred percent propellant-less propulsion technology for flight.

The X Prize is a $10 million prize to jumpstart the space tourism industry through competition between entrepreneurs and rocket experts around the world. The purse is to be awarded to the first team that privately finances, builds and launches a spaceship able to carry three people to 62.5 miles (100 kilometers) altitude, then returns safely to Earth, repeating the launch with the same ship within two weeks.

Open/closed door decision

GCT is on a quest to prove the existence of an underlying sea of energy at every point in the universe predicted by Quantum physics. This sea of energy is different from the cosmic microwave background and is also referred to as the electromagnetic quantum vacuum, since it is the lowest state of otherwise empty space. By utilizing a zero point field energy/superconductor-based propulsion system, GCT contends the door to space travel can truly be opened.

But in an X Prize Foundation letter to GCT, the rationale for closing the door on the group's X Prize team status is up-front.


"In light of the novel and untried technology you propose, the Committee has a concern of the credibility of this technology. The X Prize Foundation strongly encourages the use of all technologies for the X Prize competition. However, over the past years, we’ve been besieged by a variety of groups making technological claims that weren’t real," explains Ken Davidian, Director of Operations for the St. Louis, Missouri-based X Prize Foundation, in the letter to GCT.
"We will be happy to reconsider your application when provided with evidence of the feasibility of your proposed technology. We strongly encourage GCT to continue with its research and keep us posted as developments warrant our attention," the letter states.
Gravity of the situation

Asked to comment on the GCT situation, Gregg Maryniak, Executive Director of the X Prize Foundation told SPACE.com: "Our policy is that we do not discuss pending applications. We only discuss them when they are approved," Maryniak said. "We have not accepted their [GCT's] application…and we haven't foreclosed the possibility of accepting their application," he said.

At present, there are 24 teams in seven countries that are officially registered as X Prize teams -- all vying for the $10 million purse, Maryniak said. "I'm ready to issue that check to somebody that actually does it."

Victor Rozsnyay, GCT's Founder and Chief Executive Officer, told SPACE.com he's not surprised by the X Prize Foundation decision and return of the $1,000 X Prize application fee. "Since Gravity Control Technologies is working on developing propulsion systems capable of controlling gravity for flight -- a 180 degree departure from what is currently accepted as feasible -- it was likely that our application would not be approved. All other X Prize teams are developing variations of rocket technology, including some ingenious designs," Rozsnyay said. Rozsnyay said that rocketry has been around for over half a century. That technology is tested and proven, he said. "Gravity control on the other hand does not -- and could not -- even exist according to traditional science," he explained.

Credibility level

One of the primarily goals of GCT research aims at introducing affordable, commercial scale space tourism vessels. A craft dubbed the "Space Tourist" would be capable of non-stop space excursions, carrying over a thousand people on each 8-hour flight. Preliminary design specifications call for a triple deck craft equipped with "Hull Wide Propulsion Assembly" technology. Seating will be provided for 1004 passengers, 25 flight attendants, and operated by a three-person crew. Given appropriate funding, GCT envisions flying an initial prototype of the Space Tourist around 2012.

"We feel that the X Prize committee acted in the best interest of the Foundation when rejecting our application," Rozsnyay said. "A certain level of credibility must be met for such a widely visible and respected organization. In the opinion of the X Prize Team Registration Committee, in its current stage of development, gravity control does not meet that credibility level." Rozsnyay said the X Prize letter offers to review another GCT application - as long as the group shows evidence for the feasibility of their propulsion idea. "We will continue to work toward this goal, and when successful, resubmit our application," he said. Rozsnyay said he thanks the X Prize for considering GCT's work and wished all the other teams in the race continued success. "May the best one win the prize," Rozsnyay said.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Extended News; Technical
KEYWORDS: nonnasa; podkletnov; space; spaceflight; suborbital
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: RightWhale
Well.. pretty much.
If a physicist 'loses credibility', then he's pretty much blacklisted afterwards and never gets any serious time after that.
A sad commentary on science, but it seems to work for some projects, but not others.

Such things happen.

But as far as repossessing the actual PhD..
The guys trying it would be lucky to come away merely splashed with liquid nitrogen and whacked in the backside with a hammer.
21 posted on 06/16/2003 1:06:21 PM PDT by Darksheare (Nox aeternus en pax.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
What the telescope is showing is that in the universe there is something out there that is accelerating the spread of the galaxies. Its something different than gravity as we know it.
////////////////////
Until a few years ago, it was the conventional wisdom that the expansion of the universe that began with the big bang was slowing down. Dr. Ed Weiler, the head of science for NASA and the person in charge of the Hubble, says that in fact, it's speeding up. "It means that we don't understand gravity," he says. "This implies there's some negative energy force, some anti-gravity, that's actually pushing things apart. We don't understand it. It's not supposed to be there." He says it's something that wasn't known before Hubble.
22 posted on 06/17/2003 10:03:46 AM PDT by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer
The accelerating expansion is a good thing for physicists because it is producing a huge amount of fresh theoretical work. It's a bonanza for young cosmologists, and perhaps something useful in an engineering sense will come of it. One thing for sure: none of the explanations so far are satisfactory. Whether some garage mechanic in Hungary will come up with the right answer and create a practical application remains to be seen.
23 posted on 06/17/2003 10:11:33 AM PDT by RightWhale (gazing at shadows)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Traces of sanity are detected here and there.

GCT's web site seems long on theory and short on experimental results.

24 posted on 06/17/2003 10:55:11 AM PDT by jimt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimt
It's an Art Bell kind of subject. Lot's of fun to do what-ifs, and they did cover it last night on Coast. George read this article on air.
25 posted on 06/17/2003 10:58:35 AM PDT by RightWhale (gazing at shadows)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
The accelerating expansion is a good thing for physicists because it is producing a huge amount of fresh theoretical work. It's a bonanza for young cosmologists, and perhaps something useful in an engineering sense will come of it.
///////////////
What this is--is a precurser to a paradigm shift. That is the way we understand things in the not too distant future is going to shift radically as it did for Newton and Einstein. What the accelerating expansion means is that the force of gravity that we know--is drop in a very big ocean--made of something else.

so who knows. anyone brave enough to tackle the subject should at least be given rope.... let time tell whether they lasso the cosmos or their own necks.


26 posted on 06/18/2003 6:26:43 PM PDT by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer; Starwind; Light Speed; Poohbah; Alamo-Girl; Travis McGee; Jeff Head
Date Posted: 29-Jul-2002 JANE'S DEFENCE WEEKLY - JULY 31, 2002

Anti-gravity propulsion comes 'out of the closet'

NICK COOK JDW Aerospace Consultant London

Boeing, the world's largest aircraft manufacturer, has admitted that it is working on experimental anti-gravity projects that could overturn a century of conventional aerospace propulsion technology if the science that underpins them - science that senior Boeing officials describe as "valid" - can be engineered into hardware.

As part of the effort, which is being run out of Boeing's Phantom Works advanced research and development facility in Seattle, the company is trying to solicit the services of a Russian scientist who claims he has developed 'high-' and 'low-power' anti-gravity devices in Russia and Finland.
The approach, however, has been thwarted by Russian officialdom.

The Boeing drive to develop a collaborative relationship with the scientist in question, Dr Evgeny Podkletnov, has its own internal project name:

'GRASP' - Gravity Research for Advanced Space Propulsion.

A briefing document on GRASP obtained by Jane's Defence Weekly sets out what Boeing believes to be at stake. "If gravity modification is real," it says, "it will alter the entire aerospace business." The report was written by Jamie Childress, principal investigator for Boeing's propellentless propulsion work at the Phantom Works in Seattle.

GRASP's objective is to explore propellentless propulsion (the aerospace world's more formal term for anti-gravity), determine the validity of Podkletnov's work and "examine possible uses for such a technology". Applications, the company says, could include space launch systems, artificial gravity on spacecraft, aircraft propulsion and 'fuelless' electricity generation - so-called 'free energy'.

But it is also apparent that Podkletnov's work could be engineered into a radical form of weapon system. The GRASP paper focuses on Podkletnov's claims that his high-power experiments, using a device called an 'impulse gravity generator', are capable of producing a beam of 'gravity-like' energy that can exert an instantaneous force of 1,000g on any object - enough, in principle, to vaporise it, especially if the object is moving at high speed.

Podkletnov maintains that a laboratory installation in Russia has already demonstrated the 4in (10.16cm) wide beam's ability to repel objects a kilometre away and that it exhibits negligible power loss at distances of up to 200km (JDW 24 July). Such a device, observers say, could be adapted for use as an anti-satellite weapon or a ballistic missile shield.

The GRASP paper details the beam's reported characteristics: that it is immune to electromagnetic shielding, that it can penetrate any intermediate barriers (objects placed between the generator and the target), that it propagates at very high speed ("possibly light speed or greater") and that the total force is proportional to target mass - that its effect, in other words, is exactly the same as gravity's.

Podkletnov's claims first surfaced in 1992 when he published a paper detailing his low-power experiments into gravity-shielding using superconductors, materials that lose their electrical resistance at low temperatures. The original experiments were conducted at the University of Technology in Tampere, Finland, before moving to Russia.

Podkletnov, who has a PhD in materials science from Tampere and the University of Chemical Technology in Moscow, declared that any object placed above his rapidly spinning superconducting apparatus lost up to 2% of its weight.

Although he was vilified by traditionalists who claimed that gravity-shielding was impossible under the known laws of physics, the US National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) went on to attempt a replication of his work in the mid-1990s.

Because NASA lacked Podkletnov's unique formula for the 30cm yttrium-barium copper oxide (YBCO) superconducting ceramic discs - a formula the Russian maintains is critical to the experiment's success - the attempt failed. NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center in Alabama will shortly conduct a second set of experiments, this time using apparatus built to Podkletnov's specifications.

In August 2001, Podkletnov published a paper revealing his experimental high-power work and it is this that forms the focus of the GRASP report. Boeing wants to build its own impulse gravity generator at Seattle but admits that it lacks vital knowledge in the area of the YBCO emitter - Podkletnov's special superconducting apparatus - which forms the heart of the generator.

As a result, Boeing recently approached Podkletnov directly, but promptly fell foul of Russian technology transfer controls. George Muellner, the outgoing head of the Boeing Phantom Works, confirmed that attempts by Boeing to work with Podkletnov had been blocked by Moscow, which is seeking to stem the exodus of Russian high-technology to the West.

Muellner is convinced, however, that the science underpinning Podkletnov's work is real. "The physical principles - and Podkletnov's device is not the only one - appear to be valid," he said. He confirmed that Boeing had conducted tests on a number of other anti-gravity devices, some of which were detailed in JDW 24 July.

"There is basic science there. They're not breaking the laws of physics. The issue is whether the science can be engineered into something workable," Muellner said.

The GRASP briefing document reveals that BAE Systems and Lockheed Martin have also contacted Podkletnov "and have some activity in this area".

It is also possible, Boeing admits, that "classified activities in gravity modification may exist". The paper points out that Podkletnov is strongly anti-military and will only provide assistance if the research is carried out in the 'white world' of open development.

GRASP concludes that a "positive result from experiments would give Boeing a substantial advantage in the aerospace industry".

Reported operation of high-power gravity device: the YBCO emitter is cooled to superconducting conditions and the inner electric coil produces a magnetic field inside it. A very high voltage pulse is input to the emitter which then discharges to the collector. The discharge is guided and contained by the magnetic field in the outer coil

(Source: Jane's/Boeing) Diagram showing configuration of low-power gravity modification experiment (Source: Jane's/Boeing) © 2002 Jane's Information Group

27 posted on 04/01/2004 6:42:09 AM PST by Paul Ross ("A country that cannot control its borders isn't really a country any more."-President Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Ping. Some news.
28 posted on 04/01/2004 6:43:04 AM PST by Paul Ross ("A country that cannot control its borders isn't really a country any more."-President Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross
a "positive result from experiments would give Boeing a substantial advantage in the aerospace industry".

Mastering anti-gravity propulsion would indeed be a feather in someone's cap. FTL would be another, It won't be done with electrical/magnetic phenomena.

29 posted on 04/01/2004 9:17:49 AM PST by RightWhale (Theorems link concepts; proofs establish links)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross
Thanks for the information!
30 posted on 04/01/2004 9:14:24 PM PST by Alamo-Girl (Glad to be a monthly contributor to Free Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

related and similar to Paul Ross' post:
Altering Gravity
Popular Mechanics
Europe's BAE Systems, the company created by the merger of British Aerospace and Marconi Electronics Systems, has acknowledged a speculative research effort called Project Greenglow. In the United States, the Boeing Phantom Works (BPW) has issued a qualified denial that it is taking part in a similar program called GRASP, for "gravity research applied to space propulsion." BPW denies it is funding the project with company money, but acknowledges it cannot comment on "black projects." Both projects, as well as several private efforts, are believed to be building on fundamental research by Ning Li, a former University of Alabama researcher, who was the first to successfully construct a superconducting disc considered to be essential to creating a gravity-altering force... In April 2003, NASA was scheduled to launch the most sensitive gravity-measuring instruments ever built -- the orbiting Gravity Probe B experiment. If Li's theory about a link between electromagnetic fields and the gravitation force is correct, it will be confirmed by NASA data.
Probably a dead link, I didn't check it.

31 posted on 12/13/2004 10:38:24 AM PST by SunkenCiv ("All I have seen teaches me trust the Creator for all I have not seen." -- Emerson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
There is no such thing as gravity,
the earth just sucks.
32 posted on 12/13/2004 10:43:00 AM PST by Bon mots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bon mots

[rimshot!]


33 posted on 12/13/2004 11:08:11 AM PST by SunkenCiv ("All I have seen teaches me trust the Creator for all I have not seen." -- Emerson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer
there is something out there that is accelerating the spread of the galaxies. Its something different than gravity as we know it.

It's an old thread, but sometimes further insight wanders in. Turns out that gravity can repel as well as attract depending on conditions. Negative gravity. The force that drove inflation right after the Big Bang was gravity, a negative direction to the usual 'commonsense' concept. The force causing acceleration of expansion right now is probably gravity acting in its non-local mode.

34 posted on 12/13/2004 12:19:55 PM PST by RightWhale (Destroy the dark; restore the light)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson