Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is liberal media bias a myth?
townhall.com ^ | June 16, 2003 | Pat Buchanan

Posted on 06/16/2003 6:48:53 AM PDT by End Times Sentinel

Is liberal media bias a myth?
Pat Buchanan

June 16, 2003

"What Liberal Media?" blared the monster headline atop the full-page ad in The New York Times. Its author was Eric Alterman of The Nation, who has a book out of the same title.

There was a touch of irony in Alterman's choosing the Times to place an ad declaring liberal bias to be a "myth." For that paper has lately been embroiled in the greatest scandal in its history, the Jayson Blair affair, caused by its almost blind devotion to liberalism's god of "diversity" in the newsroom.

And, as a judge of bias, Alterman is poorly situated. He is so far left he considers network anchors Dan Rather and Peter Jennings to be conservatives. Moreover, he argues from exceptions to prove his rules. Because the Times endorsed New York Gov. George Pataki over a hapless black Democratic nominee, Alterman argues, the Times is not really reliably liberal.

If this issue of media bias is to be discussed, there is a need for some standard of left-to-right. Let me suggest a simple one. If Al Gore is center-left and George Bush center-right, one measure of whether a publication is liberal or conservative would be whether it endorsed Gore or Bush -- and which party's presidential candidate it almost always endorses. And if being pro-life and in favor of Bush's tax cuts is conservative and being pro-choice and against the Bush tax cuts is liberal, what then constitutes the liberal press?

Answer: All three major networks, PBS, NPR and virtually all major U.S. papers -- Boston Globe, New York Times, Philadelphia Inquirer, Baltimore Sun, Washington Post, Atlanta Constitution, Miami Herald, Chicago Tribune, Denver Post, Los Angeles Times. While the Wall Street Journal editorial page is neoconservative, USA Today -- the nation's largest newspaper -- is left of center.

Not only are the editorial pages of most major papers liberal, the news staffs are overwhelmingly so. At the annual White House correspondents dinners, conservatives are a tiny minority. Opinion surveys of the national press found 80 percent to 90 percent voted for McGovern and Mondale, though Nixon and Reagan both carried 49 states. How many celebrity journalists can you name who support Operation Rescue?

If the network news anchors are liberal, so, too, are the hosts of the morning shows, Matt Lowry, Katie Couric, Diane Sawyer and Charlie Gibson. The anchors of the Sunday interview shows are Tim Russert, off Pat Moynihan's staff, and George Stephanopolous, from Bill Clinton's staff, and Bob Schieffer of CBS, whom no one has ever accused of being a Dixiecrat.

Alterman does, however, have a valid point about commentators. Following Spiro Agnew's attack on the national press in 1969, most major newspapers -- realizing they had lost touch with millions of readers -- began creating op-ed pages and opening them up to conservatives. Today, columnists on the right are fully competitive and many are more widely syndicated than their liberal colleagues.

After the breakthrough by conservative columnists came the breakthrough in talk radio. Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Neil Boortz, Ollie North, Gordon Liddy, Michael Savage, Michael Reagan and other conservatives dominate talk radio, nationally and locally. It is hard to name a liberal who has succeeded in national radio.

Among the magazines of politics and opinion, National Review, The Weekly Standard, Human Events and The American Conservative have a combined circulation far higher than The Nation and The New Republic.

In cable TV, Fox News, which is now predominant, tilts toward Bush, but CNN, whose anchors are Judy Woodruff, Wolf Blitzer and Aaron Brown, lists heavily to port.

Conclusion: Big Media remains a fortress of liberalism, but in the populist and democratic media -- the op-ed pages, the Internet, cable TV, talk radio -- where people have a variety of voices from which to choose -- conservatives prevail. With this caveat:

The House of Conservatism is a house divided. Conservatives of today are not the conservatives of yesterday. Many embrace the foreign policy of Wilson, the trade policy of FDR and the immigration policy of LBJ. They have made their peace with Big Government.

Can anyone name a federal agency George W. Bush or his father shut down, or a single federal program they ever abolished?

Many of today's conservatives would have been called liberals in the 1960s. Indeed, some were liberals then. And their progeny have come to accept foreign aid, the Department of Education, even the National Endowment for the Arts.

They call it compassionate conservatism.



TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: alterman; buchanan; commie; delusional; leftwingnut; mediabias

1 posted on 06/16/2003 6:48:53 AM PDT by End Times Sentinel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Owl_Eagle
"What Liberal Media?" blared the monster headline atop the full-page ad in The New York Times. Its author was Eric Alterman of The Nation, who has a book out of the same title.

Being part of the problem, Mr. Alterman can't see the trees for the forest.

2 posted on 06/16/2003 6:56:15 AM PDT by AlaskaErik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Owl_Eagle
Is the liberal media bias a myth?

Short answer = Only if you are a liberal.

3 posted on 06/16/2003 7:00:07 AM PDT by TruthWillWin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Owl_Eagle
As Buchanan illustrates so well, the main problem is that there simply aren't enough true conservatives to go around anymore. Most self-styled conservatives nowadays are just some variant of liberal - the main distinction being what strand of socialist big government they find most appealing..

The House of Conservatism is a house divided. Conservatives of today are not the conservatives of yesterday. Many embrace the foreign policy of Wilson, the trade policy of FDR and the immigration policy of LBJ. They have made their peace with Big Government.

Can anyone name a federal agency George W. Bush or his father shut down, or a single federal program they ever abolished?

Many of today's conservatives would have been called liberals in the 1960s. Indeed, some were liberals then. And their progeny have come to accept foreign aid, the Department of Education, even the National Endowment for the Arts.

They call it compassionate conservatism.

4 posted on 06/16/2003 7:04:31 AM PDT by AntiGuv (™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Owl_Eagle
And Pat Buchanan's first choice for Vice- President was James Hoffa, Jr., union boss of the United Auto Workers.

So what does that make Pat?
5 posted on 06/16/2003 7:05:39 AM PDT by 11th Earl of Mar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Owl_Eagle
I vaguely recall the NY Times blasting George H. W. Bush for the speaking fees he earned after he left office, but to the best of my knowledge, not a word about Billie Boy. Can someone verify this? (I don't subscribe to the NY Times online or to Lexis-Nexus.)
6 posted on 06/16/2003 7:10:55 AM PDT by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Owl_Eagle
Liberal media bias is a myth. Liberals are a myth. Everything's a myth. Now leave me alone I'm going to take a nap.
7 posted on 06/16/2003 7:20:12 AM PDT by TheCrusader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Owl_Eagle
I've been a member of the media for more than a quarter-century. Yes, there is liberal bias. No, there is not a monolithic left-wing media conspiracy where the editors of all the usual suspects set around in some star chamber saying, "What can we do to screw G.W. Bush and conservatism today?" The bias has to do with the kind of people who go into the business today. I got into it because it was exciting and I wanted to chronicle history. Most people today get into it because they "want to change the world" and "want to make a difference" and "want to afflict the comfortable and comfort the afflicted." You know, the kind of folks who ran off to Zanzibar with the Peace Corps in the '60s. Plus they pompously think they're getting into a profession like law, medicine, etc., where journalism is actually a trade.

Alterman's book is a joke, because his basic point is that Democrat doesn't equal liberal and because he thinks the "conservative" folks in the corporate boardrooms dictate news policy. In 2003, Democrat pretty much equals liberal and there is a bigger wall than you'd think between the business side and working side in journalism.

Of course if you've read any of Alterman's columns, he basically is so far to the left that he makes Leon Trotsky look like Jesse Helms, so to him Rather, Jennings, etc., probably legitimately are rabid right-wingers.

8 posted on 06/16/2003 7:27:45 AM PDT by GB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GB
Very well put GB. 
 
No, there is not a monolithic left-wing media conspiracy where the editors of all the usual suspects set around in some star chamber saying, "What can we do to screw G.W. Bush and conservatism today?"
 
While there's plenty of examples of writers exercising bias (my personal favorite was an article in the Sunday Phila Inq. 2 weeks ago on the Road Map to peace.  The third paragraph was totally dedicated to the fact that Bush spoke of a continuous area rather than contiguous.  As if that was more important than what Sharon or Abbas had to say on the talks), I think it's more a subconscious thing that results in certain things being thought of as news worthy- homelessness during a Republican administration or incidents of gun violence and other things not news worthy- a black on white hate crime like the Carr brothers in Wichita. 
 
Owl_Eagle

”Guns Before Butter.”

9 posted on 06/16/2003 8:23:08 AM PDT by End Times Sentinel ("It is unlikely there'll be a reduction in the wages of sin.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Owl_Eagle
bump
10 posted on 06/17/2003 9:21:47 AM PDT by foreverfree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson