Skip to comments.
DMZ Twist: U.S. Retreat Unsettles North Korea
NYT ^
| 06/16/03
| JAMES BROOKE
Posted on 06/16/2003 5:55:49 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
How would Kim Jong-Il react if American troops completely withdraw from S. Korea? He may have a heart attack.:)
To: TigerLikesRooster
Withdraw completely.
2
posted on
06/16/2003 6:00:28 AM PDT
by
b4its2late
(It is bad to suppress laughter; it goes back down and spreads to your hips.)
To: TigerLikesRooster
I didn't realize what a fanastic ploy the announcement relating to moving the DMZ troops actually was. I underestimated the President again. North Korea has just been b#tchslapped. For a dummy, President certainly knows how to handle his emenies and reward his friends.
To: TigerLikesRooster
why not remove all us troops from south korea???
To: BushCountry
Roh came into power on a wave of anti-Americanism in SK. Rumsfeld casually said, "We'll leave anytime you like," effectively cutting the Korean Klinton off at his silly knees. Fell in love with Rummy all over again.
SK was so helpful during Iraq--sent 700 non-military advisors. Wonder if they've arrived yet in Baghdad?
5
posted on
06/16/2003 6:15:56 AM PDT
by
Mamzelle
To: BushCountry
For a dummy, President certainly knows how to handle his emenies and reward his friends.And ignore everyone else.
6
posted on
06/16/2003 6:17:33 AM PDT
by
templar
To: Mamzelle
Re #5
They have been deployed at Talil airbase in S. Iraq for more than a month.
To: TigerLikesRooster
Frum wrote this all, and better, a few weeks ago in NRO. I'll try to find the link. Not that I like Frum, he's almost as irritating as Bill Kristol--but one ought to give credit where it is due.
What's going on in Korea, involving the chess game with American pawns now being withdrawn, is a sterling example of foreign/military policy working to American advantage first and foremost. We ought to notice just for the pleasure of seeing it.
8
posted on
06/16/2003 6:23:26 AM PDT
by
Mamzelle
To: TigerLikesRooster
Last I heard, they were still waiting for them. Glad to know they got there. While not in the same category as France, I found SK's support rather tepid, considering what the US has done for them.
9
posted on
06/16/2003 6:24:43 AM PDT
by
Mamzelle
To: TigerLikesRooster
There's nothing not to love about this move. It makes our guys safer, and more ready to deliver the counterstrike, while scaring the pants off of both Koreas.
10
posted on
06/16/2003 6:26:08 AM PDT
by
Steel Wolf
(Stop reading my tag line.)
To: Steel Wolf
Hey Steel Wolf, what's your MOS? I used to be a 98G Korean back in the day.
FReegards from a fellow DLI alum.
11
posted on
06/16/2003 6:30:18 AM PDT
by
nravoter
(I've given a name to my pain, and it's "Hillary".)
To: templar
And ignore everyone else.Why such cynicism? Or should I ask where you get your inside information?
Real Americans appreciate the President.
12
posted on
06/16/2003 6:35:21 AM PDT
by
zip
To: zip
I think templar is making ironic use of the Rice doctrine--"Punish France, ignore Germany and forgive Russia."
13
posted on
06/16/2003 6:39:21 AM PDT
by
Mamzelle
To: TigerLikesRooster
Maybe the International Solidarity Movement (the idiots that try and be speed bumps for Israeli bulldozers) and the
dumba@@es that were human shields in Iraq can get together and replace our troops on the DMZ.
14
posted on
06/16/2003 7:41:15 AM PDT
by
sticker
To: sticker
Re #14
I think that they would rather be in Pyongyang, serving as human shields for Kim Jong-Il's palace.
To: TigerLikesRooster
Let the bombs begin!
To: Thud
FYI
To: TigerLikesRooster
bttt
To: Mamzelle
Think about it....there nation is eternally, and especially now, on the brink of war with an oversized aggressor neighbor. Exactly how many divisions should they move half way around the world? Their token force sends the exact right message.
19
posted on
06/16/2003 9:01:11 AM PDT
by
wtc911
To: TigerLikesRooster
For Americans, this concept is glaringly out of date in light of the war in Iraq, where much of the attack was waged by long-distance bombs and cruise missiles instead of soldiers climbing out of trenches. In an age when American and British forces took over Iraq in three weeks and lost fewer than 200 soldiers, the idea of leaving 14,000 troops exposed to withering bombardments seems nonsensicalSilly to compare Koreans to Arabs...arabs stupid fighters, never developed higher then Allah Akbar charge. N. Korea all mountain too, not open desert....non-military military analysts waste of oxygen.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson