To: ItisaReligionofPeace
Would women a hundred years ago tolerated this? I don't know. I suspect many women a hundred years ago would have expected it.
All except for one difference, which is that a hundred years ago few man would wait till age 33+ to get married in the first place ;-)
To: Dr. Frank
a hundred years ago few man would wait till age 33 A hundred years ago most men would be nearing the end of their life expentency. (Well, I think it was 45)
To: Dr. Frank
"All except for one difference, which is that a hundred years ago few man would wait till age 33+ to get married in the first place ;-)"
My paternal grandfather was born in 1879 and he waited until he was 31 to marry and he raised 4 sons and 4 daughters. Actually I think it was not that unusual for a man to be 30 or so before marrying someone who was often 10 or more years younger. In my own case I turned 21 in 1965 and in that era it was very common in the southeast for young men to be married and have children by 22. By the time I was 23 people were acting as though something was wrong with me because I was not married yet.
As for whether my grandfather was celibate until marriage, I seriously doubt it, I certainly wasn't.
260 posted on
06/15/2003 3:42:53 PM PDT by
RipSawyer
(Mercy on a pore boy lemme have a dollar bill!)
To: Dr. Frank fan
561 posted on
05/22/2005 3:35:19 PM PDT by
jjmcgo
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson