I have never been able to get by the fact that what is known about mutations, based upon real-world experience, is that they are destructive, not creative. Maybe I shoulda hadda V-8 ... ;-}
Hi Alamo-Girl! I'm just seeing your post #389 now -- don't know how I missed it before. Anyhoot, some of
Tertium Organum's science is a little dated, given the work was written very early in the last century. But Ouspensky seems very strong on dimensionality issues, which is why I remembered him after all these years (I read this book before I turned 20, and haven't revisited it since -- til very recently). Clearly, he is a Platonist in his approach to fundamental issues.
I think I'll be doing a serious reconsideration of Ouspensky very soon, just as soon as I finish the three or so books I've got going right now (including the Penrose).... Sigh, so much to read, so little time!!! (I've got a date with Attila Grandpierre this weekend -- another Platonist, it seems to me, on the basis of a cursury flip through his pages....)
Thank you so much, A-G, for the link, the information, and for all you do in general. This has been a marvelously informative thread so far.