[Alamo-Girl]

Thank you so much for your post! It was quite engaging.

For Lurkers interested in following up on your statement that "In physics time/space is same thing" I'd like to offer this link on the construction of the Lorentz Transformation

Is the process of differentiation named creation or evolution? From my perspective it's all about the intent of describing the process. Is mystery mechanical or is mechanical mysterious? Both perspectives can lead to greater knowledge. All that matters is honest exposition.

IMHO, there would probably not be so great a hostility, and little offense to the mention of intelligent design or evolution, if there were no political and ideological agendas.

We will never fully grasp the ultimate void (beginning) unless we perceive undifferentiatedness - meaning no consciousness or memory in the sense that we can describe it to one another in linear time-dependent symbolism (language).

Indeed, null beginning is a concept which exceeds the capability of language. But the geometric mechanics (4D space/time) are more accessible from the higher dimensional dynamics:

Classical and Quantized Aspects of Dynamics in Five Dimensional Relativity (pdf)

[JmyBryan]

Of course, human consciousness seems to carry with it strong impulse to ideological belief, which may in fact be the impetus to symbolic representation.

Mathematics is certainly more apt to provide useful description of extra-dimensional "realities" BUT we're still discovering mis- and reinterpretations of the particle trails of atom-smashers. Not to mention the new stuff.

Your links are excellent, thank you.

Seems were all sitting around waiting for proof of the Higgs Boson, right? LOL

http://www.cnn.com/2003/TECH/space/06/05/universe.origins.reut/