Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

N. Korea: Clinton invited Kim Jong-Il, but Kim refused
Chosun Ilbo ^ | 06/15/03 | Kwon Dae-Yol

Posted on 06/15/2003 6:13:41 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster

/begin my translation

Clinton invited Kim Jong-Il, but Kim refused

The former president Kim Dae-Jung disclosed that the former American president Bill Clinton invited chairman Kim Jong-Il for U.S. visit. But N. Korea refused.

In his interview on KBS (TV program) "Sunday Special," the former president Kim recollected the time toward the end of Clinton presidency when U.S.-N. Korean dialogue was at its peak. He revealed, "President Clinton sent me a letter. In it he invited chairman Kim to visit U.S.. But he refused to go." He went on to say, "Why did he not go? He should have. He hesitated and an election was held in U.S.. Republicans won. Everything went back to square one."

Throughout his interview, he complained about N. Korea's timid attitude. He deplored, "Great agreements were reached on such things as (reconnecting) Kyong-Ui railroads and (building) Kae-sung Industry Complex. We could have implemented them. That would have been a great progress. But he failed to follow through. Most of all, chairman Kim did not come to Seoul. I was disappointed."

On resolving N. Korean nuclear crisis, he said, "The solution is quite obvious. N. Korea gives up nukes and subjects herself to an irreversible complete verification. Then U.S. guarantees N. Korean security." He said that N. Korea should give up nukes first. In particular, he said, "N. Koreans must have seen with their eyes how Hussein regime collapsed. This should be the lesson to N. Korea. N. Korea should immediately accept the 5 way talk which includes S. Korea and Japan. It should not be difficult."

He continued, "Right now, pride or brinkmanship won't help N. Korea. Things have been changed. This is not '94. Clinton adminstration is gone." He asked N. Korea to follow the changing tide of the time.

/snip

/end my translation


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: clinton; invitation; kimdaejung; nkorea; summit
What strikes me after reading this article is that the history could have easily gone the other way if Bush did not prevail in Florida and Kim Jong-Il was more accomodating.

Kim Dae-Jung is now in the eye of the storm called "Cash-for-Summit Scandal." Several of his minions were either already indicted or in danger of being indicted. It is revealed through an ongoing investigation that $500 million was indeed illegally sent to secure Kim Dae-Jung's summit with Kim Jong-Il. Many laws were broken. His reputation is in ruins. However it remains to be seen if the current president Roh Moo-Hyun intervenes and keeps them from serving any jail time.

In this article, he is essentially complaining bitterly to Kim Jong-Il for not following through. If Kim Jong-Il visited Seoul and Washington D.C., more agreements were signed and all these illegal transactions under the table may not have come out. Even if they did, it may not have been so damaging. So goes his reasoning, it appears.

Basically, he claims that he did not see Kim Jong-Il for what he really is, a despot bent on continuing to extort other countries for their money and still keep his edge of intimidation. He is either stupid or blatantly disingenuous here, in my opinion. Predictably, now he is changing this tune to accomodate the Bush's line. If he took a tougher line earlier, this belated attempt at persuading N. Korea would have been unnecessary.

1 posted on 06/15/2003 6:13:41 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo; Steel Wolf
Ping!
2 posted on 06/15/2003 6:14:55 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
BTTT
3 posted on 06/15/2003 6:29:01 AM PDT by yonif
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Kim Jong-Il had good taste, in some respects.
4 posted on 06/15/2003 6:31:47 AM PDT by wretchard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wretchard
Re #4

Can you elaborate a little?

5 posted on 06/15/2003 6:34:52 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
......he is essentially complaining bitterly to Kim Jong-Il for not following through......

Interesting take. Probably true, too.

Bump.

6 posted on 06/15/2003 6:39:48 AM PDT by DoctorMichael (Damn it Jim, I'm a Conservative, NOT a Republican!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Kim Jong Il understands the art of belligerent mendicancy. But it only works with those who like to be abused. I doubt Kim respected former President Clinton any more than a shakedown artist respects his marks. In that sense, Kim knew his man.
7 posted on 06/15/2003 7:19:47 AM PDT by wretchard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: wretchard
Re #7

Thanks for your reply.

8 posted on 06/15/2003 7:24:20 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Fascinating take, actually.... You've baited me to quickly search out the whole summary from KDJ's tv appearance. So much of the current administration's appeasement policy is a legacy of the KDJ era, that, if the originator renounced it now, it might cause such a revolution in the ROK that they might actually apply logic to foreign policy!
:)
Thanks!
9 posted on 06/15/2003 7:25:41 AM PDT by OahuBreeze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
I dunno... After looking at a few summaries of Kim Dae Jung's interview, it seems he's more aggravated that Kim Jong Il missed his window of opportunity with the Clinton administration. Really sorry to say it, and it's only after a quick read, but it looks like KDJ's whole focus was on frustration at all sides for not having his vision realized -- not surprising, nevertheless, disappointing. Have yet to find any reference to him addressing the 24 million people (Koreans) suffering under the brutal criminal dictator -- no mention of remorse for the Japanese kidnap victims (the dead or alive ones); just references to how Kim Jong Il could have better played his hand in dealing with the Japanese.... I'm not such a soft touch I can't see the forest for the trees (though apparently, unlike some, I do remember the forest is made up of trees...). KDJ does seem some trees, however and displayed an outpouring of sympathy for one especially hard-pressed group...: "He said he could not contain his sadness at 'seeing those who worked for the country and its economy over the past decades subjected to prosecution even though they were not involved in corruption.'" (Yonhap). I guess we all have our priorities.
10 posted on 06/15/2003 7:49:22 AM PDT by OahuBreeze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Thanks so much for the translation and analysis. Very interesting.
11 posted on 06/15/2003 8:06:09 AM PDT by Amelia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
The paragraph below it all. Thank goodness that GW is our president instead of the Goron.

"Right now, pride or brinkmanship won't help N. Korea. Things have been changed. This is not '94. Clinton adminstration is gone." He asked N. Korea to follow the changing tide of the time.

12 posted on 06/15/2003 8:11:57 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (Support The Brave Iranian Students as they bring about a needed regime change!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OahuBreeze
Re #9,#10

First of all, when I said, "accomodating Bush's line", I meant that he couched his arguement with the packaging of Bush's new approach. He had not really spoken about the dire consequences if N. Korea does not heed America. He did his best to avoid uttering such words. Now he is flashing the possibility of the dire consequence. But, essentially he is still all for "Sunshine". A lot of S. Korean carrots but no S. Korean sticks except some reference to possible American sticks, that is.

As for him seeing the forest, he only sees the liberal half of the forest, where negotiations with Kim Jong-Il are moving smoothly. He apparently refuses to see that N. Korean regime is not really up for give-and-take, but essentially for take-and-take. Because it is a regime too far gone to reform itself even if it generally feel that something needs to be done. It tends to back out of any commitment at the slightest misgivings because it knows deep down that it cannot sustain even a mild change. That is the nature of the regime. The least it has to do is to convene a large party meeting and officially remove all Stalinist upper leadership and bring in a new pragmatic leadership and chart a new course as China or Vietnam did. Or Soviet Union after the death of Stalin. That may not be sufficient. But it is the required minimum.

Kim Dae-Jung is good at cut and paste a lot of articles and make some nice speech out of it. He is eager to show others that he knows his stuff. But his stuff is more for impressing others with his "intellectual prowress" than really solving the problem at hand.

All you read from the article could be his repackaging and spin after the fact. Kim Jong-Il did not play as he wanted. Getting really impatient, he threw Kim Jong-Il just about everything he wanted. Kim Jong-Il played him like a fiddle. Kim Jong-Il may not have done any good for him or his country in the long-term. But Kim Jong-Il got what he wanted. One source of this impatience is Kim Dae-Jung's obsession with Nobel Peace Prize. He had to get it at all costs. While he lobbied hard to those with connections to Nobel committe, he bought the summit with at least $500 million dollars of cash, which was poured into developing missiles and nukes, as it turned out.

He is a cover-up artist who can put up a good front. The good front is always his ostentatious display of his intellectual prowress.

13 posted on 06/15/2003 9:08:12 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Clinton, of course, is the guy that gave Castro a good, friendly handshake when he was here for a U.N. functions, so I'm sure he would have lept at the chance to get a photo op with the Benevolent Leader.

Being that Kim is afraid or unwilling to get on a plane, and so far hasn't even troubled himself to come go to Seoul, I'd say that the idea of him coming to the U.S. was a bit of a stretch. Unless they held the meeting in Vegas, that is. I'm sure that would have gotten Kim's atten

14 posted on 06/15/2003 10:00:27 AM PDT by Steel Wolf (Stop reading my tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Steel Wolf
Re #14

If he ever comes to U.S., he would come by a cruise ship. Indeed, it is credible to assume that he could not come here because of his fear of flying. On top of that, he may have trouble handling himself in an open environment of the west, where he is not viewed as a god.

If he wanted to meet Clinton, he would have invited Clinton himself. I am sure that Clinton was happy to oblige. Actually, that almost happened. Clinton's team went to N. Korea and settled on many issues. The only thing left was for Clinton to go there and sign the deal with Kim Jong-Il. But Florida recount flap happened and Clinton was fully occupied. Quite likely, it was the twist which had changed the course of the history.

15 posted on 06/15/2003 10:11:36 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Great work. Thanks.
16 posted on 06/15/2003 10:18:44 AM PDT by tallhappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
This is simply more evidence that Clinton's irresolution and fundamental weakness as a leader of a great nation encouraged the rogues of the world to bring us to the present global security crisis.

That man (and his erstwhile wench) are America's enduring albatross.
17 posted on 06/15/2003 11:10:27 AM PDT by witnesstothefall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson