Posted on 06/14/2003 11:37:46 AM PDT by webber
FOX GOT THE CASE RESULT 100% WRONG, SAYING THE BOY SCOUTS HAD LOST THE CASE!!
Also, Fox represented the matter as being "the Boy Scouts trying to keep homosexuals out." I thought the whole Supreme Court case (which was a set-up to begin with, as are so many Marxist attacks on American institutions from A to Z) was about whether the Boy Scouts could forbid a person to be a scout LEADER if the person professed to be homosexual.
If the Boy Scouts have among their members BOYS who happen to be homosexual in orientation, I fail to see how that would matter to anything. Such young boys need guidance and wholesome influences as much as do any other young boys. One central, necessary concept in the whole idea of a group like the Boy Scouts is going to be its NON-SEXUAL nature.
I don't think homosexuals are always tuned in to the sexual side of their nature. Surely they take time out to work, study, (and sue people), etc., and do the same non-sexual activities that the rest of us do. I would hope that people would think the Boy Scouts had about as much relation to anything sexual as, say, the IRS does.
And here's where I'm gonna get pelted with stones, but I'm gonna say it anyway: There ARE a few things of interest in the world BESIDES sex, you know.
People also need to remember that one homosexual organization submitted an amicus curiae brief in support of the Boy Scouts' position, during the litigation before the Supreme Court. They did this b/c they had no trouble seeing the larger issue of FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION.
If those homosexual organizations who do NOT see the larger issue here want to continue to press this issue with the Boy Scouts, I invite you all to join me. We're going to go visit ALL the many gay clubs across the nation. We're going to go there and demand that WE be given full membership, and that we get to be there for ALL their activities. I figure I could get quite a large group of boring, middle-aged, average heterosexual couples together. Oh, the joy those guys will feel when we--along with our middle-age spread--join them on the dance floor under the big mirror ball. And I'll say to them, Well, c'mon, guys! You wouldn't wanna discriminate against us because of our sexual orientation, now, would you?
Come on, everyone! Let's fire up the RV's and go do it!! The heck with the Supreme Court!
In the same way the Marines say "Once a Marine, always a Marine" so it is with Eagle Scouts. As the father of an Eagle Scout, former Scoutmaster and current Troop Committee Chairman, allow me to point out that Eagle Scouts are specifically charged to uphold that honor for the rest of their life.
Thank you for recognizing the quality young men you have hired that have earned the honor of Eagle Scout. My son has also benefitted in that way from employers.
As to the Philadelphia situation, this is a matter for National BSA to get tough about if they desire to retain the recognition of the right of private association by the Supreme Court. Further whittling by the homosexual activists will result in the BSA becoming a thing of the past when moral churches decide to disassociate their young men from Scouts.
My peers (Highschool) go oh your a boyscout who cares...
While other adults have respect and admiration for me because they know how hard it is to attain such a rank and how difficult it is now more than ever.
BSA used to be tagged with honor and dignity along with being a great 2nd teacher to young men across to the country. But now I think that the publics thought is declining, when only one major controversial rule happened. I still participate and help out in the troop because I want as many people to have the same great experience that I did.
So is being a LIBERAL Progressive Democrat that says that this scat is just NORMAL.
The issue is that of freedom of association.
The Boy Scouts' policy was aimed at Scout Leaders, not boys, who I agree need healthy male experiences.
I like your idea about crashing the party !
I'm afraid that this is becoming a "mode of operation". First with the United Way and now with the Boy Scouts.
The real danger here if the National Organization doesn't act to shut it down is:
The National Org has got to shut this down and quickly.
Leave it to the Gaystapo to ruin it for a lot of kids, but that was the objective anyway, wasn't it? Wretched Pukes.
Homosexuality spreads disease.
ALL:
If you support the traditonal values of Scouting, and if you believe Scouting can be a valuable ministry to Episcopal youth, please visit the Episcopal Scouters Discussion Forum:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/episcopal_scouters/
This group is for Episcopalian Scouts and Scouters, but non-Episcopalian Scouts and Scouters are also welcome, especially those in parish-sponsored units. "Continuing Anglicans", "Orthodox Anglicans", Campfire, Girl Scouts and 4-H members are also welcome. All are welcome to discuss: Duty to God, Scouting in the Church, the religious emblems program, camp chaplaincy, etc.
I'm the moderator -- we'd love to have you join us, and please spread the word about Episcopal Scouting!
Fred Goodwin
Diocese of West Texas
Alamo Area Council
fgoodwin@sbcglobal.net
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.