[alnick]

When none are found it gives the impression that he committed a breach of the truth (lied like hell).

Except for all of that circumstantial evidence that has come up during and after the war. The anti-Bush crowd likes to pretend that that evidence doesn't exist. Doesn't fit their agenda.

• Mobile labs
• Caches of atropine vials
• Caches of chem/bio suits
• Large amounts of mustard and cyanmide in the Eurphrates
• Large stocks of suicide vests

[meenie]

Anybody that sees a picture of one of those weapon lab trucks and imagines them being a WMD has to have an overactive imagination. We have wrecks all over the country sitting in salvage yards that are WMD. How can mustard gas or cyanide in the Tigris and Euphrates be considered an WMD?

I think that we had large caches of chem/ bio suits when we went into the Gulf with our troops, we had WMD's? Ditto, atropine. Suicide vests constitute WMD? Come on, you are in a state of denial. Bush and his administration told a big whopper and you are making them look all the more ridiculous.

[stevem99]

I tend to think that Iraq did/does have chemical weapons given their history, but how does having chem suits and atrophine prove anything?

The US also carries the same, does that prove the US intends to use chemical weapons? No, it simply means they think the enemy might.