Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/13/2003 6:38:30 AM PDT by bedolido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: bedolido



2 posted on 06/13/2003 6:41:58 AM PDT by Diogenesis (If you mess with one of us, you mess with all of us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bedolido
Quicksand? More like a cesspit.
3 posted on 06/13/2003 6:43:52 AM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bedolido
Hillary Clinton surely did not time her book's publication to steal the spotlight from the nine Democratic presidential candidates...

Oh, yes she did. There shall be no viable Democrat candidates until Hitlery rides her broom to the rescue for the open seat in 2008.

4 posted on 06/13/2003 6:46:04 AM PDT by Always A Marine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Liz
Ping.
5 posted on 06/13/2003 6:48:03 AM PDT by Graewoulf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bedolido
DEMOCRATS SINKING IN CLINTON CESSPOOL, and man o' man is it stinky.
6 posted on 06/13/2003 6:49:40 AM PDT by BOBTHENAILER (One by one, we're ridding the world of vermin. RATs are next!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bedolido
Yep. The Dimocrats have a nice losing streak going. Let's hope it keeps going until election day!
8 posted on 06/13/2003 6:52:57 AM PDT by Destructor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bedolido
administration's bogus rationale for the war

I assume this is refering to the lack of discovery (thus far) of evidence that Iraq had WMD prior to the start of the war. Well folks, I don't give a rat's ass about WMD. Saddam's regime is gone and that's good enough for me.

11 posted on 06/13/2003 7:06:43 AM PDT by scooter2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bedolido
Hillary Clinton's ability to dominate the attention of the celebrity-conscious public...

Oh, bullroar. The entire media frenzy over Hillary's book is self-induced. No one West of the Hudson River cares one whit what Hillary has to say about anything. It's all a bunch of New York quiche-eaters imagining that their own obsequious devotion to Her Heinous is shared by everyone else.

Put her on Larry King Live and she can't out-draw Clinton accuser Juanita Broaddrick. Her Barbara Walters interview drew one-third the audience that Monica Lewinsky's did. She's a tempest in a New York teapot, and that's all she is.

It is true, however, that in their fascination with Miss Hillary, the New York media are blowing the Democratic presidential candidates right off the stage and right into oblivion. They are all diminished for this. Our author seems to think that this was not by Hillary's design, but I think I'm going to throw him in the 'naive' pile.


16 posted on 06/13/2003 7:18:34 AM PDT by Nick Danger (The liberals are slaughtering themselves at the gates of the newsroom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bedolido
Polls indicate that the president's popularity is based both on his status as a wartime commander and on his straight-arrow persona.

As opposed to Clinton's bent persona.

18 posted on 06/13/2003 7:30:49 AM PDT by Slyfox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bedolido
I'd call it the "Legacy Wake".
19 posted on 06/13/2003 7:34:37 AM PDT by b4its2late (It is bad to suppress laughter; it goes back down and spreads to your hips.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bedolido
Americans now know that the president did not try at all to avoid the war.

Say what?????

23 posted on 06/13/2003 7:47:41 AM PDT by MrsEmmaPeel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bedolido

25 posted on 06/13/2003 7:48:50 AM PDT by SerpentDove (Each post focus-group tested for maximum wallop.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bedolido
Hillary Clinton surely did not time her book's publication to steal the spotlight from the nine Democratic presidential candidates, but that's the result.

Bullsh*t. That's exactly what she did and how she planned it. Count on her to make other, similar "mistakes" that will "accidently hurt fellow Democrats" in the 2004 Presidential race. She wants Bush to win, so she will have a clean shot in 2008.

The only wild card will be the Veep position. If Bush goes with Cheney again in 2004, look for a 2008 win by Hillary, since there will be no strong Veep-to-President candidate in Cheney. IF HOWEVER, Bush very diplomatically retires Cheney, and pulls in a qualified woman or minority Veep, Clinton will have a much harder go at it in 2008.

31 posted on 06/13/2003 7:56:28 AM PDT by Lazamataz (POLICE TAGLINE DO NOT CROSS POLICE TAGLINE DO NOT CROSS POLICE TAGLINE DO NOT CROSS POLICE TAGLINE D)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bedolido
It will keep alive the Monica Lewinsky story that Hillary's book revived, and with it the comparison of the moral tone of the two White Houses. And Bill Clinton's book will pick up where Hillary's left off in eclipsing the Democratic presidential aspirants as they - and the party - try in vain to get out from under the Clinton shadow.

The stain isn't coming off that dress. People have a limited attention span, and once a specific persona is linked with someone, it stays. JFK is remembered for his head being blown off, Ted Kennedy for "the drive", LBJ for screwing up Nam, and Billy for being a lech. The problem for the Clintons is that whenever they're on stage, the first thought in everyone's mind is "lech and lech enabler."

32 posted on 06/13/2003 8:03:25 AM PDT by Richard Kimball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson