Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Badray
But having said that, the CSA was not usurping the rights of the individual states to condone and endorse, or condemn and end slavery.

Wrong.

The Constitution of the Confederate States of America
Article I, Section 9
(4) No bill of attainder, ex post facto law, or law denying or impairing the right of property in negro slaves shall be passed.

The Constitution of the Confederate States of America SPECIFICALLY OUTLAWS all governments under the Confederacy from EVER ending slavery - which is what's so damned laughable about the revisionists "state's rights" claimed excuse for rebelling against the Union. The Confederate states would have had no "right" to alter their slave holding status under the Confederate Constitution.

156 posted on 06/15/2003 2:13:03 PM PDT by Monitor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies ]


To: Monitor
Excellent point! Thank you.
157 posted on 06/15/2003 2:15:53 PM PDT by Grand Old Partisan (You can read about my history of the GOP at www.republicanbasics.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies ]

To: Monitor
Re #157.

Thanks; I missed that.

Walt

159 posted on 06/15/2003 2:31:16 PM PDT by WhiskeyPapa (Virtue is the uncontested prize.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies ]

To: Monitor
I was referring only to the law (as shown) that is described in the link at post #140, not the CSA Constitution.
219 posted on 06/16/2003 12:20:37 AM PDT by Badray (Molon Labe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson