Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sabertooth
Indeed. Shouldn't that serve as a cautionary note to Republicans willing to cast aside principle?

No. You don't replace a Bush with a Clinton under any circumstances that I can think of.

I voted for Bush41, but it's his own fault he lost the votes he won in '88. No one's vote is a politician's entitlement.

We did our part. Others did not.

276 posted on 06/13/2003 8:59:56 AM PDT by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies ]


To: Consort
No. You don't replace a Bush with a Clinton under any circumstances that I can think of.

Then you need to make sure the Bushes understand what's necessary to keep conservative votes. Either they work for us, or we work for them.

We did our part. Others did not.

That would be Bush 41, and his whiz bang advisors. Their strategy lost the election of 1992.

For politicians to be accountable, we have to hold them accountable. If we don't, they won't.


284 posted on 06/13/2003 9:12:20 AM PDT by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 276 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson