Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sharktrager; Chad Fairbanks; glorgau; technochick99
Am surprised that this is a 'new' thing to cable users - thought most cable companies already gave a price break to their video customers (though the non-video customers consider it a surcharge, of course! :).

I guess the cable companies just can't allow a natural price advantage work in their favor - with DSL, you have to have a phone line in service, so it's going to cost you at least $16-17 for the basic line in addition to the DSL charge.

I had a house in Old East Dallas (renting it out, now) that has had SBC DSL for ~3.5 years. TCI / AT&T / Comcast have never made cable internet available in most of Dallas, being content to wire all the 'burbs who had separate cable systems prior to the TCI / AT&T buyout, and only wiring a few very large apartment areas & 1 or 2 affluent neighborhoods in Dallas proper.

To this day you can't get any info out of Comcast regarding possible availability dates. Methinks it has something to do with Dallas' cable infrastructure - has to be the last burg in the universe with dual-coax cable. Gonna cost a lotta $$$ to pull the fiber-o, and SBC already has a significant portion of the city covered with DSL, having concentrated their Project Pronto in Dallas a few years ago.

I'd have probably gone with cable in Dallas, had I had the opportunity - the speed dfference is just too great to ignore, for essentially the same price. Gotta admit, tho, wondered many times as my cable TV went down (on a very regular basis) if my inet would have been down as well. Fiber-o would probably help that, but it's gonna be a long time coming in Dallas.

One $$$ savings tip not mentioned yet - if you have cable, and are not married to your land line, ditch the Telco phone line (assuming you can use cellular instead, like so many ppl are doing these days). Little known factoid of the cell phone number portability issue is that it will allow you to change your old home number over to your cellphone......

27 posted on 06/11/2003 11:50:05 AM PDT by Ready4Freddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Ready4Freddy
If that's true about local number portability, then how do telemarketers (who are not allowed to call cell numbers) know that it's a cell number when their list of prefixes shows it as being a landline prefix?
48 posted on 06/11/2003 2:26:14 PM PDT by brianl703
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: Ready4Freddy
wondered many times as my cable TV went down (on a very regular basis) if my inet would have been down as well.

Wondered about that myself when I had DSL. Truth is, my cable and internet connection is more reliable than DSL ever was. Not a problem, IMO, but YMMV...

67 posted on 06/11/2003 3:39:14 PM PDT by Citizen of the Savage Nation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: Ready4Freddy
Little known factoid of the cell phone number portability issue is that it will allow you to change your old home number over to your cellphone......

I had my land line shut off, and only use cellular, but I wanted to have a different number. Be advised that if you keep your land line number for you cell phone, there's no way to ensure that telemarketers can't call you, and stick you with the bill. At least with cell phones, there are certain ACs and exchanges that only belong to cell phones, and they know they'll get into serious trouble.

Mark

122 posted on 06/12/2003 10:46:09 AM PDT by MarkL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson