Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pro-abortion March in Washington Set For April 2004
Talon News ^ | 06/11/03 | Jimmy Moore

Posted on 06/11/2003 8:43:01 AM PDT by bedolido

WASHINGTON (Talon News) -- Several pro-abortion groups announced on Tuesday that they are planning a march on Washington, DC on April 25, 2004. The Feminist Majority, the National Organization for Women (NOW), NARAL and Planned Parenthood are combining their efforts for this gathering inauspiciously entitled "Save Women's Lives: March for Freedom of Choice."

Talon News reported yesterday that pro-abortion advertising will begin airing nationwide this weekend in an attempt to generate support for the cause.

"Roe v. Wade hangs by a thread and rumored anti-abortion replacements on the Supreme Court could serve for the next 40 years," concluded Kim Gandy, president of NOW.

Gandy expressed her fear about the supposed ramifications of overturning the controversial 1973 Supreme Court ruling legalizing abortion in America on her young daughter.

"In other words, the reversal of Roe would last for generations, and the entire reproductive life of my 10-year-old daughter hinges on what we do in the coming year. NOW will be mobilizing women and men across this country to march on Washington for our mothers, for our daughters, and for ourselves there will never be a more important time to stand up for women's lives," Gandy said.

Eleanor Smeal, the president of the Feminist Majority, continued the pro-abortion rhetoric regarding next year's rally. "The time is now. We must sound the alarm that women's fundamental rights are in danger," she exclaimed. "The overwhelming majority of Americans will not go back to the days of back alley abortions."

Not to be outdone, NARAL President Kate Michelman pointed the finger directly at President Bush and Republicans in Congress, admonishing them for trying to take abortion rights away from them.

"We have a simple message for anti-choice leaders who control the White House and Congress -- don't tread on us, don't tread on our right to choose and don't tread on our right to privacy," she reprimanded. "Americans will not stand by silently as our rights are trampled. Pro-choice Americans are on the move ready to take to the streets to protect the health, lives and rights of American women."

Finally, the President of Planned Parenthood Foundation of America Gloria Feldt says that women should make the decisions regarding their own body, not the government and that Americans will rally in support of abortion.

"We refuse to be the generation that both won and lost the rights to birth control and abortion. We stand for the principle that women -- in consultation with their families and their physicians -- should make their own reproductive and health decisions. Not politicians and not the government. The Bush administration, the U.S. Congress, and the nation need to see hundreds of thousands of Americans showing their vocal support for reproductive freedom," Feldt remarked.

Copyright © 2003 Talon News -- All rights reserved.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: march; murdertheunborn; proabortion; protectunborn; unborn; washington

1 posted on 06/11/2003 8:43:01 AM PDT by bedolido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bedolido
Good luck getting the numbers the March for Life gets EVERY YEAR. However, watch the media hype this up like everything else their cohorts do. The pro-lifers are lucky to get 2 minutes on the local evening news in DC.
2 posted on 06/11/2003 8:47:09 AM PDT by Pyro7480 (+ Vive Jesus! (Live Jesus!) +)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bedolido
"Save Women's Lives: March for Freedom of Choice."

What about the "unborn woman's" life?

Ever notice it's called Freedom of Choice, yet it isn't associated with life?

It's freedom to choose murder.

It should be called Pro-Death

3 posted on 06/11/2003 8:47:13 AM PDT by Zavien Doombringer (Private 1st Class - 101st Viking Kitty.....Valhalla.....All the Way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bedolido
Several pro-abortion groups announced on Tuesday that they are planning a march on Washington, DC on April 25, 2004. The Feminist Majority, the National Organization for Women (NOW), NARAL and Planned Parenthood are combining their efforts for this gathering inauspiciously entitled "Save Women's Lives: March for Freedom of Choice."

At this point I suppose it would be useless to point out that babies (fetuses) are being murdered, and almost half of all anticipated births are female. And to hold a march, demanding the right to kill the helpless ....is something else.

4 posted on 06/11/2003 8:50:56 AM PDT by xJones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zavien Doombringer
"Save Women's Lives Choice: March for Freedom of Choice to Murder."
5 posted on 06/11/2003 8:54:21 AM PDT by Lady Eileen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lady Eileen
Love that "reading between the lines", true to every word!
6 posted on 06/11/2003 8:59:00 AM PDT by Zavien Doombringer (Private 1st Class - 101st Viking Kitty.....Valhalla.....All the Way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bedolido
Their membership must be low so it's time to call their troops together for a common cause--anti-Bush sentiment!
7 posted on 06/11/2003 9:05:01 AM PDT by lilylangtree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lady Eileen
Once again these selfish hags march under the banner of "Women's Health". But they are not about some woman who's health or life is at risk because she is pregnant. They are about women seeking "back alley" abortions. They are about women being selfish and unconcerned about consequences. It's all so disgusting. They never show their true colors. There would be no support.
8 posted on 06/11/2003 9:07:13 AM PDT by whereasandsoforth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bedolido
Ever notice how in nature, the animals that are unstable or have bad genetics are more likely to kill their young?
9 posted on 06/11/2003 9:07:45 AM PDT by UseYourHead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bedolido
I saw part of their press conference on C-Span 2 this morning. They had a college attendee speaker who alleged that her generation is majority pro-abortion (patently untrue). The interesting thing about this was that she was probably 30 years younger than the rest of the activists.

The press pro-abortion bias was remarkable in terms of the questions asked. One man asked since the country is 70% pro-abortion, why do Republicans control Congress and the White House and "What can WE do about it?"

Eleanor Smeal was quick to add that George Bush got a minority of the popular vote (as did Al Gore, but that is beside the point!).

And Kim Gandy's impassioned plea that her daughter not lose the "right to choose" was bizarre -- actually pleading that your grandchildren be murdered in the womb. (My father's girlfriend is a big lib, and my father told me that his girlfriend's daughter has had 3 abortions. It is a good thing she has not raised the issue of "choice" with me, or I would ask, "Wouldn't you rather now have three grandchildren alive than that your daughter is childless and you have no grandchildren?")

But some people have no comprehension that their "feel-good" nostrums have any real-life consequences. And the "freedom to choose" results in empty lives as well as empty wombs.

10 posted on 06/11/2003 11:30:09 AM PDT by HateBill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480
Good luck getting the numbers the March for Life gets EVERY YEAR.

They'll get good numbers. The freaks love to come out for a protest. They did in the 1980s when I attended as a counter-potestor.

I hope they can set up the little cemetary in front of the capital again. That annoyed the pro-aborts to no end.

11 posted on 06/11/2003 11:57:46 AM PDT by Question_Assumptions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Question_Assumptions
They did in the 1980s when I attended as a counter-potestor.

They may. That was a bit of a different time though. You watch. Most of them are going to be middle-aged, burned-out feminists. A large percentage of the pro-life marchers are young people.

I'll probably be still around DC in April 2004, so I'm probably going to head down there to counterprotest myself.

12 posted on 06/11/2003 12:24:20 PM PDT by Pyro7480 (+ Vive Jesus! (Live Jesus!) +)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480
I'll probably be still around DC in April 2004, so I'm probably going to head down there to counterprotest myself.

It was actually kinda fun to just yell at the Kool Aid drinkers. On the other hand, keep an eye open for the more reasonable useful idiots. A level headed conversation with them can actually give them something to think about.

While I'm sure that you will get a lot of burnt out feminists, just remember that the left cross-protests. You'll get gays, anti-war people, anarchits, etc., too.

13 posted on 06/11/2003 12:51:02 PM PDT by Question_Assumptions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480

Picture of previous DC pro-choice march

14 posted on 06/11/2003 1:05:56 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
What is that a picture of? It looks like Klan women.
15 posted on 06/11/2003 1:11:06 PM PDT by Pyro7480 (+ Vive Jesus! (Live Jesus!) +)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480
Proposed 2003 theme logo


16 posted on 06/11/2003 1:29:06 PM PDT by Dataman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480
A large percentage of the pro-life marchers are young people.

They most cetainly are. :-}

17 posted on 06/11/2003 1:30:44 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
It's understandable. All who were born after January 22, 1973 are the survivors. Our brothers and sisters are dead, butchered by the millions.
18 posted on 06/11/2003 1:33:51 PM PDT by Pyro7480 (+ Vive Jesus! (Live Jesus!) +)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: bedolido
Freepers, rather than waiting to see what happens with Estrada, we need to take the lead. That means presuring Senators, special interest groups, media organizations, etc. This thread is meant to be an ongoing effort to get this man confirmed. For too many years liberals have had their way on the courts. Now, President Bush is in a position to move the courts to the right. The election of '02 showed that the country is with the President. I think it's time to let Daschle, Hillary, and Pelosi know this is Bush country. Are you with me! Let's FREEP these people.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/847037/posts
19 posted on 06/25/2003 7:52:28 PM PDT by votelife (FREE MIGUEL ESTRADA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson