As usual you insult but do not let the reader see what you call 'a stupid example' because it is not. Here it is so all will know what is being discussed:
If you were to let a hundred paleontologists loose in a cemetery, take away the gravestones and ask them to show from the cadavers who descended from who, they would be totally unable to do it even though the specimens they would have at hand are almost perfect and much much better than what they base their extravagant claims of descent on.
Species do not descend from one million year individual to another a million years later. They descend from generation to generation. There cannot be any such leaps in descent and your denying my example and calling it ridiculous shows the desperation of your position. If paleontology cannot even prove the descent of a son from a father where the cadavers are in excellent condition, it certainly cannot prove the descent of anything accross millions of years with fossils which in almost all cases are only partial and in poor condition.