The great G3K has spoken!!
He hasn't seen the skull, but JUST from a picture, he is expert enough, to tell that it is a hoax.
All those paleontologists just might as well send G3K all of their snapshots, he can tell far more from pictures, then they can from the specimens themselves.
Send those pictures in guys, we will NEVER be fooled again.
192 posted on
06/11/2003 6:56:06 PM PDT by
Aric2000
(If the history of science shows us anything, it is that we get nowhere by labeling our ignorance god)
To: Aric2000
"He hasn't seen the skull, but JUST from a picture, he is expert enough, to tell that it is a hoax."
You haven't seen it either yet you believe it real.
194 posted on
06/11/2003 7:00:28 PM PDT by
ALS
("No, I'm NOT a Professor. But I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night!")
To: Aric2000
Placemarker.
197 posted on
06/11/2003 7:07:13 PM PDT by
PatrickHenry
(Felix, qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas.)
To: Aric2000
He hasn't seen the skull, but JUST from a picture, he is expert enough, to tell that it is a hoax. That it is a total paste up job is clearly evident from the picture. Only the lower jaw seems to be whole. The rest seems to have been assembled with glue and many of the pieces (vide the large triangle in the middle of the top of the skull) do not seem to fit very well.
It is also very humorous how paleontologists can claim to know from a partial skull not only that it was able to stand up on two feet but also make tools and I am sure that if you pushed them enough what his last meal was.
345 posted on
06/14/2003 6:49:05 AM PDT by
gore3000
(Intelligent people do not believe in evolution.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson