Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: far sider
I was wondering because if they found just a few and assumed there was an entire civilization of them, they could be very incorrect. The fossils they have found might just be deformed humans. I've seen plenty folk who look like Neanderthals...plenty
134 posted on 06/11/2003 1:19:33 PM PDT by Norse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies ]


To: Norse
There are plenty of neanderthal fossils and there's no reason to think of them as sub-human. There is evidence that they had a somewhat advanced culture and society. there is also evidence that some of them had medical conditions that affected there bone structure, giving them a more primitive look. However, if a healthy Neanderthal man in modern clothes walked down a city street today, you probably wouldn't notice him as being ununsual.

Typically evolutionists make the most ambitious claims based on fossils that are fragmentary, i.e., the less they have to start with the more they can invent. For instance, about twenty years ago they found a fossil they called Sivapithecus and said it was a human ancestor. Creationists who looks at the fossil said it was probably an ape but it was too incomplete to be sure. Later a more complete fossil of a sivapithecus was found, and evolutionists had to admit it was just an orangutan.

In this article you can see they found three fairly complete skulls and they admit that they are humans. If the skulls were in little tiny pieces they could glue together however they wanted, who knows what claims they would make. If it was Johanson or the Leaky's, instead of Tim White, I suspect the claims would really be spectacular.

143 posted on 06/11/2003 1:57:35 PM PDT by far sider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson