Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MrLeRoy
Was post-Prohibition alcohol use "epidemically" larger than its use during Prohibition?

Every attempt to measure the matter at the time when the evidence was most available (i.e. the years immediately following repeal of Prohibition I) shows that drinking actually went down (for one thing, once alcohol could again be shipped without the need for concealment, the market shifted from high-proof booze to low-proof beer and wine).

During the 1980s, advocates of Prohibition II seem to have undertaken a concerted effort to sweep this inconvenient fact down the memory hole.

19 posted on 06/11/2003 10:08:54 AM PDT by steve-b
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: steve-b
Every attempt to measure the matter at the time when the evidence was most available (i.e. the years immediately following repeal of Prohibition I) shows that drinking actually went down (for one thing, once alcohol could again be shipped without the need for concealment, the market shifted from high-proof booze to low-proof beer and wine).

Interesting. Have any links?

23 posted on 06/12/2003 7:24:43 AM PDT by MrLeRoy (The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. - Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson