Replies

And you continue to demonstrate why I wouldn't knowingly try to have a rational discussion on this issue with a SSAD sufferer.

Firstly, although only a male can "nail" anyone under any circumstances, and we are therefore clearly talking about male SSAD sufferers, you introduce the subject of lesbians in a dishonest and puerile attempt to discredit a statement about males.

Clearly, women molest in very small numbers.

Then you try to recast a wisecrack with a lot of truth in it into an extreme absolute that, as it is not subject to "proof" simply in the nature of things, can easily be denied and mocked.

By the standards applied by the malicious and dishonest, we can't even "prove" that all rattlesnakes are venomous without individually examining each snake. After all, they assert, there might be lots of non-venomous rattlers out there, and you don't know until a "scientific study" is performed.

The dishonesty with which SSAD sufferers invariably address this subject bears out St. Peter Damian:

According to Damian, the vice of sodomy "surpasses the enormity of all others," because: "Without fail, it brings death to the body and destruction to the soul. It pollutes the flesh, extinguishes the light of the mind, expels the Holy Spirit from the temple of the human heart, and gives entrance to the devil, the stimulator of lust: It leads to error, totally removes truth from the deluded mind . . . It opens up Hell and closes the gates of Paradise . . . It is this vice that violates temperance, slays modesty, strangles chastity, and slaughters virginity . . . It defiles all things, sullies all things, pollutes all things . . . This utterly diseased queen of Sodom renders him who obeys the laws of her tyranny infamous to men and odious to God . . . She strips her knights of the armor of virtue, exposing them to be pierced by the spears of every vice. . . she defiles him in secret and dishonors him in public; she gnaws at his conscience like a worm and consumes his flesh like fire . . . this unfortunate man is deprived of all moral sense, his memory fails, and the mind's vision is darkened."

By the standards applied by the malicious and dishonest, we can't even "prove" that all rattlesnakes are venomous without individually examining each snake. After all, they assert, there might be lots of non-venomous rattlers out there, and you don't know until a "scientific study" is performed.

Just like I said, it's "rude" to ask that he provide any real evidence for his universal libel. It should be assumed that all homosexuals, without exception, are child molester wannabes and that any who might not be should be considered a rare exception and only if their existence can be verified. Of course, then it breaks into a religious rant that has no meaning to someone who isn't a Christian.