Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Qwerty
Ok.. then address which rights of these collective individuals are being violated by private consensual adult sodomy.

The law is being violated whether it be consensual a violation or not and homosexuals don’t have that right in many states. What rights of consensual incestuals are being violated through same-sex incest? The drug user, the bestial and his private property…???

As a side note, can you go through a single thread without saying "sophistry"?

Sure, I do it all the time, funny how it usually comes up when “debating” you?

See my earlier posts. We can go around on this all day.

Bullogna, you’ve NEVER offered one bit of credible logic supporting why the 9th isn’t at the mercy of the 10th. I’d be happy to give you Madison’s and Jefferson's oppinion against your incredible piece of logic “9th amendment hint” if I thought you’d bother heeding our founding fathers take on it.

More BS from you. AND... now you pretend to know what sexual practices I engage in? Quit thinking about what I get up to, Clint.

Eww…I’d rather not, but unlike a normal mentally healthy person (Heterosexual), sex is something they do. To the mentally ill person proclaiming to be ('Homosexual'), sex SODOMY is what they are; to pretend your perversion isn’t sodomy is laughable.

On to what you think the government should busy itself with and has an interest in...

Misdemeanor fines are fine by me when those who practice perversion are found. The government (the people) wants to protect our society from those who pervert and seek to negatively change it.

Disagree, except for pedophilia and euthanasia.. but those arguments are for another time. Try to stick to a single topic.

Actually they are exactly the same arguments for homosexuality, if you’re going to make it based on consent then don’t be a hypocrite.

Ad hominem means instead of debating the points of the argument, you debate characteristics of your opponent.

Boy talk about sticking to the subject, ad hominem is prejudice of character, irrational attack, AKA lies…Try looking up the word in your dictionary.

No, this thread as titled is about lifting pedophilia from the list of mental illnesses.

It’s about paraphilic disorder to which pedophilia is ONLY one of many including homosexuality. If you’d bother reading past the title maybe you’d be better prepared.

It incorrectly states that the psychiatric association is trying to lift the taboo, but anyway. it isn't about homosexuality.

It’s coming up for debate at he next APA convention. Homosexuals are lobbying to remove gender identity disorder (a paraphilia) from the DSM, paraphilic disorders often have more than one syndrome afflicting a person, homosexuals often have multiple paraphilia's including their disorder of homosexuality. This is all part of the homosexual agenda, to say any less Is laughable.

So again.. If you want to argue about homosexuality, either mail me or keep it on a thread about homosexuality.

As long as you keep making erroneous public statements there’s not need, you might as well get use to it. Should you ever want to talk about leaving your pathology for any reason I'm always willing to help, just Freepmail me..

165 posted on 06/11/2003 6:32:45 PM PDT by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies ]


To: Clint N. Suhks
Clint.. this post was pitiful. You still have no idea what ad hominem means, and probably still deny the definition of "murder" too.

"The law is being violated whether it be consensual a violation or not"

Well, I guess that's as close as it gets to you admitting no "rights" have been violated.

"Misdemeanor fines are fine by me when those who practice perversion are found."

Of course they are. You enjoy having your personal morals enforced by the government.

Fortunately you're on the losing side. The tide turned against you, and it's only going to change faster.

"The government (the people) wants to protect our society from those who pervert and seek to negatively change it."

Explain how homosexuals seek to pervert and negatively affect society. Make predictions about what will happen if gay couples have civil unions. Then we can see if you're right, since it will probably happen within my lifetime.

" if you’re going to make it based on consent then don’t be a hypocrite."

If you want to start a thread on pedophilia and euthanasia, then I'll explain my viewpoint on those subjects there. Focus on this one idea for once...

209 posted on 06/12/2003 4:10:07 PM PDT by Qwerty (Breakin' the LAW, Breakin the LAW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson