Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Qwerty
Removing it as a mental illness is NOT condoning it, any more than saying murderers are not necessarily mentally ill. If you have a victim, it's still a crime.

Define "condone" -- and please, don't just give me a dictionary definition. Define it in the context of your above statement. What steps would the APA have to take to actually "condone" pedophilia, in your opinion?

157 posted on 06/11/2003 4:08:00 PM PDT by L.N. Smithee (Just because I don't think like you doesn't mean I don't think for myself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]


To: L.N. Smithee
Such redefinition perverts the very process of definition. Like the character in Alice in Wonderland/Through the ZLooking Glass, who said that words mean precisely what I want them to mean. This ignores the fact that thought we can conceive of many models, only some will fit reality.
158 posted on 06/11/2003 4:45:53 PM PDT by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies ]

To: L.N. Smithee
What I am am talking about is what Orwell deplored in "1984."
160 posted on 06/11/2003 4:49:51 PM PDT by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies ]

To: L.N. Smithee
"Define "condone" -- What steps would the APA have to take to actually "condone" pedophilia, in your opinion?"

I think the APA would have to take the stance that not only is pedophilia not a mental illness, but that it was not harmful and/or may be beneficial to children. I realize that some have made this claim, but it is NOT a mainstream idea.

196 posted on 06/12/2003 10:57:21 AM PDT by Qwerty (Breakin' the LAW, Breakin the LAW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson