Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Editorial: We, too, are deeply troubled
Jerusalem Post ^ | Jun. 10, 2003

Posted on 06/11/2003 1:10:53 AM PDT by yonif

After sentencing al-Qaida shoe-bomber Richard Reid last January, US District Court Judge William Young turned to Reid and said, "You are not an enemy combatant. You are a terrorist. We do not negotiate with terrorists. We do not sign documents with terrorists. We hunt them down one by one and bring them to justice."

Abdel Aziz Rantisi is a terrorist. As one of the senior leaders of Hamas, he is a senior terrorist. He has for years been involved in all aspects of Hamas's terrorist infrastructure. Rantisi incites Muslims to become suicide bombers. He raises funds for weapons. He mobilizes operatives to strike. And after each successful bombing he acts as a terrorist spokesman and apologist.

According to a statement released yesterday by the Defense Ministry, Rantisi has personally overseen Hamas terror operations for the past several months stepping in after Salah Shehada was killed and Muhammad Deif was taken out of action by IDF strikes. We have no reason to doubt the veracity of this statement.

We also do not doubt the Defense Ministry's statement that Rantisi shares the criminal responsibility for the murder of 227 Israelis and the wounding of 1,393 others since the beginning of the Palestinian terrorist war three years ago.

As one of the heads of Hamas, Rantisi, like Hamas spiritual leader Sheikh Ahmed Yassin, is culpable for the actions of their organization regardless of whether they personally issued every specific kill order. Rantisi and Yassin are the brains of Hamas. At their direction, the organization murders. With their guidance, the organization grows and increases its public support. They, together with other terrorists like Yasser Arafat, are responsible for the indoctrination of large swathes of Palestinian society to believe that the murder of Jews is moral and just.

Following the air force's unsuccessful attempt to kill Rantisi yesterday, White House spokesman Ari Fleischer was quick to say that US President George W. Bush is "deeply troubled" by the IDF's action. The president apparently believes that, by taking out Rantisi, the government is somehow harming the chances for peace.

To this we can only comment that we were unaware the US believes that Hamas is an organization worthy of protecting. We would also point out that Rantisi is an enemy of the US. Ahead of the US operation to destroy Saddam Hussein's regime, Rantisi called on the Iraqis to carry out suicide bombings against US forces in Iraq.

In an article published on Hamas's Web site in late December, translated by MEMRI, Rantisi wrote: "In order to defend the homeland from the terrorist Crusader [i.e. US] attack, there is a need for people who yearn for Paradise, and the shortest way to Paradise is death for [the sake of] Allah.

Some of us should see the joyful and satisfied faces of the mothers in Iraq when they part from the fruit of their loins, who go off to the realms of honor, the realms of martyrdom. This is so that the enemy of the nation knows that safeguarding honor and the homeland is dearer than life, and that our mothers in Iraq, like our mothers in Palestine, [are willing] to sacrifice the fruit of their loins but not their honor."

Then, too, in a debate among Islamic scholars in 2001 on the question of whether Islam permits suicide bombers, Rantisi cited a 1996 fatwa by one Sheikh Qardawi who extolled the Islamic virtue of suicide bombers. Qardawi is one of the heads of the Muslim Brotherhood the Egyptian jihadist movement that spawned Hamas, the Palestinian Islamic Jihad, and al-Gama'at al-Islamiya a sister organization of al-Qaida. So Rantisi and Osama bin Laden share the same preacher.

All of this of course brings us to the blatant hypocrisy of the US when considering Palestinian terrorists. While it is clear that anyone in any way related to al-Qaida is a terrorist, we are told that there is a distinction between "political" and "military" wings of the terrorist organizations that are mainly dedicated to killing Israelis. The only thing "political" about a killer like Rantisi is that he orders others to do the dirty work for him.

While the US can take out anyone related to al-Qaida, it expects Israel to protect bin Laden's Palestinian counterparts in the terrorism business. We must by this logic allow them to freely congregate to plan attacks, appear on television to incite attacks in Arabic and justify them in English, and watch quietly as they conduct "negotiations" with Egypt and the EU.

Like Bush, we too are deeply troubled by yesterday's attempt to take out a mass murderer of our fellow citizens. We are troubled because Rantisi has lived to murder another day. We wish the air force better luck in the future in carrying out its mission of safeguarding the lives of Israeli citizens from the murderous likes of Rantisi.


TOPICS: Editorial; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; Israel; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bush; hypocrisy; israel; rantisi; roadmap; sharon; terrorist; waronterrorism; williamyoung

1 posted on 06/11/2003 1:10:53 AM PDT by yonif
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SJackson; Yehuda; Nachum; adam_az; LarryM; American in Israel; ReligionofMassDestruction; ...
Ping.
2 posted on 06/11/2003 1:11:17 AM PDT by yonif
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yonif
Good points.
3 posted on 06/11/2003 1:13:19 AM PDT by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MEG33
Bang! I'm deeply troubled the Palestinian Bin Laden is still alive. And you can shove your criticism where the sun don't shine, George W. Clinton!
4 posted on 06/11/2003 1:18:24 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: yonif
The president apparently believes that, by taking out Rantisi, the government is somehow harming the chances for peace.

I think he's probably more upset about the fact that the Israelis sent two gunships, shot seven missiles, and missed. Had they taken care of business quietly, say......a traffic accident...or......a heart attack, things might be viewed differently. Making a public show of military force and then failing was not such a great idea.

5 posted on 06/11/2003 1:24:10 AM PDT by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999
LMAO! If I were Israel's Prime Minister, I'd like to ask George if he got Saddam Hussein yet... :)
6 posted on 06/11/2003 1:27:56 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Well, let's see, if the Israelis didn't know where the terrorist was, why did they shoot seven missiles at his car?
7 posted on 06/11/2003 1:32:35 AM PDT by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999
They knew where he was. I think they should have incinerated the entire street. That was the Israelis' mistake. Not vaccuming up the human filth.
8 posted on 06/11/2003 1:34:51 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
That's exactly right. They made a big show of "military might", fell right into the hands of the euroweenies, and failed to get the man they went after. Even if they would have succeeded they would have failed because it was all too public. The fact that it was a public failure didn't help anything, it only hurt.
9 posted on 06/11/2003 2:00:50 AM PDT by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: yonif
Little missles? Napalm BTTT.

Any member, sympathizer, or neighbor of HAMASS should be invited to the BBQs.

So long as they are at war with Israel, they are not at the peace table. The Pallies are not interested in controlling their friends at war with Israel.
10 posted on 06/11/2003 2:01:51 AM PDT by SevenDaysInMay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Years ago, when the terrorists struck the Israelis at Munich, the Israelis took care of business in a very crisp, clean, and deadly manner. They ended up with the admiration of the world and the fear of the terrorists. That was a successful, elegant, and deadly solution. Shooting 7 missiles at a car, missing their target, and killing bystanders is neither elegant or deadly.
11 posted on 06/11/2003 2:04:43 AM PDT by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
"you can shove your criticism where the sun don't shine, George W. Clinton!"

What is wrong with the President? This "Road Map" B.S. ranks right up there with "Islam is a religeon of peace." We need a real anti-terrorism candidate to challenge Bush for the Republican nomination. Would Rumsfeld be willing to turn on his boss?
12 posted on 06/11/2003 2:10:38 AM PDT by milemark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: yonif
'Following the air force's unsuccessful attempt to kill Rantisi yesterday, White House spokesman Ari Fleischer was quick to say that US President George W. Bush is "deeply troubled" by the IDF's action. The president apparently believes that, by taking out Rantisi, the government is somehow harming the chances for peace.'

No its the 22 other people you took out instead of the target that is the problem.
13 posted on 06/11/2003 2:13:45 AM PDT by DB (©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: milemark
I know. I have a low tolerance for BS. I have to say to the Bush bots I don't agree with everything the President does. When he's right, I'll back him. When he's wrong, I'll make clear my disagreement. Its different from the Bush haters who criticize the President for everything cause nothing he does will ever make him a good person. My take is different; by pointing out presidential error, it will make our President stronger and more effective. We need a President Bush who can be even more of a good person than he's been so far.
14 posted on 06/11/2003 2:14:59 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
We told the Iraqis and everyone else that we were coming in.

The civilians could choose to get out of the way or not.

These people were just going about their daily lives when some car comes down the street and Israeli gun ships start firing rockets at it - missing, killing other people on the street.

If you think that is the solution to the terrorist problem you are greatly mistaken.

They knew where this man lived. They were tracking him in his car. I believe they could have taken him out elsewhere without all the loss of civilian life. Had their target been the only casualty I'd be praising the Israeli action right now.
15 posted on 06/11/2003 2:23:03 AM PDT by DB (©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson