Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: doug from upland
I hope you weren't watching. Stuff like this doesn't usually get on my nerves, because I know the score with these so-called "professors" and "educators", but I know I would have coldly torn Sherman to shreds with facts and logic had I been there.

O'Reilly showed up with an empty ammo bandolier.

(No, I wasn't talking to myself the first time. *grin* )

4 posted on 06/10/2003 5:33:49 PM PDT by an amused spectator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: an amused spectator
I also saw that sneering witch. She seemed tightly wound over the fact that FNC is going to air Hannity's interview of Juanita Broaddrick at 9:00PM CST.

Actually, I found it sort of comical that she lost it the way she did! (Call me sick, but I absolutely adore it when supposedly calm, compassionate, "loving" liberals go all hysterical on TV! :)
10 posted on 06/10/2003 5:38:54 PM PDT by Humidston (Do not remove this tag under penalty of law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: an amused spectator
O'Reilly showed up with an empty ammo bandolier.

I agree totally. Here's what I posted on another thread:

Clinton's defenders always raise the Al Capone defense. "You got nuttin' on me copper!" No one ever proved in a court of law that Al Capone was in the mafia, that he was a part of a criminal gang, or that the ordered people to be murdered. They did get him on tax evasion instead. They got Clinton on perjury instead. That Capone was never convicted in court does mot mean that he was never in the mafia. That Clinton was never convicted in court does not prove he was never a rapist.

I suggest you look into the case of Army SSG Delmar Simpson. He was an Army instructor who was seduced by some of his female students. He maintained his innocence by virtue of the fact that he was seduced and therefore could not be guilty of rape. The Clinton Justice Department and the Army came up with a new principle to justify convicting him of rape. They claimed something called "constructive force" or the idea that because of SSG Simpson's "overwhelming power" over his students in a military training environment there was no such thing as consensual sex with a student -- it was rape even if the trainees consented. The same Clinton White House that created this new legal principle went on to deny that the President of the United States did not have any extra power over a 22-year old intern. SSG Simpson remains in prison to this day.

Clinton at any time can prove Juanita Broaddrick wrong in the details she gave. She said Clinton said "You don't have to worry about getting pregnant because I had measles in adulthood and am sterile." He confused measles with some other disease that if you get it in adulthood will make you sterile, but that's beside the point. Did he have measles in adulthood? If he did that is a detail that only Broaddrick could have known from her encounter with him. And guess what? Clinton is the only President since Eisenhower NOT to relase his medical records. His remain sealed. What is he hiding? Is he covering up the one fact that can prove Broaddrick right?

31 posted on 06/10/2003 6:06:51 PM PDT by FreedomCalls (As it is written, so shall it be done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson