To: LdSentinal
LaRouche in 2004 campaign How old is LaRouche now?
To: Pubbie; JohnnyZ; Theodore R.; Nathaniel Fischer; AuH2ORepublican; LdSentinal; Kuksool; Coop; ...
How 'bout a Sharpton-LaRouche ticket for the 'Rats in '04 ?
![](http://members.rogers.com/dragontan2/softball_website2/gifs/cartman.gif)
It'll be suh-weet ! :-)
6 posted on
06/09/2003 11:03:27 PM PDT by
fieldmarshaldj
(~Remember, it's not sporting to fire at RINO until charging~)
To: LdSentinal
The "neo" meant that they were conservative converts from earlier radicalism. Even Bartley is afraid to use the "C" word.
LaRouche does one thing well: gunk up searches. Doesn't matter what 20th century historical minutiae one tries to find--Fatty Arbuckles real name for instance--every other search bring up LaRouche stuff. Usually with no disclaimer to let you know the first few paragraphs, which are always attention getters, soon lead into a parallel universe where everything is connected to everything else and nothing makes a whit of sense.
10 posted on
06/09/2003 11:24:55 PM PDT by
DPB101
("I just like the tribal culture of a newsroom" --former NYT Executive Editor, Howell Raines)
To: LdSentinal
I was given a copy of this phamplet last weekend. There are several guys around here who distribute his stuff whenever it is published. It is somewhat interesting to read the ravings of an educated, but totally insane mind. However, it is hard to get through the whole thing when it makes no sense at all. I keep expecting the strands to come together. They never do.
Almost like the Libertarians.
To: LdSentinal
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson