[Last Visible Dog]

ID is NOT scientific, never can be, because it's whole PREMISE is nonscientific. GODDIDIT is not a valid premise, because it is nonfalsifiable.

That is an absolutely silly and ignorant statement.

BTW: HELLIFIKNOWWHATDIDIT is not a valid premise and as I understand it - that is the foundation of your position.

BTW: GODDIDIT is not "nonfalsifiable" (there IS a possibility of proving this point)(Remember, absence of evidence NEVER proves ANYTHING) - the belief that there is no God in "nonfalsifiable".

NOTE: ALL theories of cosmology are currently "nonfalsifiable" therefore using you logic we would be better off just howling at the moon.

You are full of clichés – science has no use for clichés

[Aric2000]

Youare going for that whole cosmology thing again, we are talking ID theory, and Biological evolution. They claim that ID will somehow replace evolution, and it won't.

Can you go get a life and quit trying to argue ENTIRELY different points?

I am talking ID, and BILOGICAL evolution and you know it.

Quit trying to turn this into another of your pissing matches please, because it is not only dishonest, it's STUPID!!