Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jlogajan
Didn't Gould say the fossil record shows stasis, not upward change? By the way, where is a complete fossil column..not just a put-together collection of rock deposition?
69 posted on 06/10/2003 6:29:07 AM PDT by metacognative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: metacognative
Didn't Gould say the fossil record shows stasis, not upward change?

I've read most of Gould's books and most of the Nature articles from which they are taken. I've never seen anything like that. Do you have a source that isn't a cobbled together quote taken out of context?

80 posted on 06/10/2003 8:05:23 AM PDT by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

To: metacognative
Didn't Gould say the fossil record shows stasis, not upward change?

Gould's "definitive" response to the question of stasis vs "upward change" is found in one of his last books, Full House. Evolution permits stasis when no change is required for survival. Thus, bacteria comprise the bulk of live, by weight. But mutations are constantly providing new kinds of individuals, and some of them survive (which doesn't mean the unchanged individuals do not also survive).

82 posted on 06/10/2003 8:30:26 AM PDT by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson