Replies

OK, I will go a step further with you.

If ANY theory, I don't care what it's about, or where it's from, claims, "then a miracle happened." Or "goddidit", it is by definition, NONSCIENTIFIC.

If on the other hand it goes to a certain point, it all adds up, and then says, "we don't know, YET", then it is probably based on a sound scientific understanding.

But Goddidit, or then a miracle happened, IS NOT SCIENCE, and can never claim to be.

Are we straight yet?

Or are you going to argue some more just to be argumentative?

re: If ANY theory, I don't care what it's about, or where it's from, claims, "then a miracle happened." )))

Heehee. "Hans Vavink", famous scientist.

OK, I will go a step further with you. If ANY theory, I don't care what it's about, or where it's from, claims, "then a miracle happened." Or "goddidit", it is by definition, NONSCIENTIFIC.

OK. That means ALL theories of the origin of matter are NONSCIENTIFIC because they all start with “a miracle happened” (something came from nothing, matter always existed, God did it).

OK. Now will you stop using this silly argument sense it disproves EVERY existing theory of the origin of matter?

If on the other hand it goes to a certain point, it all adds up, and then says, "we don't know, YET", then it is probably based on a sound scientific understanding.

Yeah. Right. God did it is nonscientific but DUH – I DON’T KNOW is scientific.