Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: metacognative
More to the point, I believe your statement about is utterly incorrect. Please don't post any out of context quotes from creationist sites. ALS tried to do that and I found the complete quote and the context, proving that the website lied about the source, content and meaning of the "quote".

The reason I can be sure you are wrong about Gould is that I have read him. He was a great admirer and defender of Darwin. Gould simply has a hypothesis that states that small genetic differences can have huge effects in the final form of a creature, giving the outward appearance of varying rates of change.

The rate of environmental change can also result in different rates of selection. The only thing Gould says taht differs from Darwin is that we now have more and better information about specific histories.

150 posted on 06/10/2003 1:00:42 PM PDT by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies ]


To: js1138
I also used tobe an admirer of Gould. Please tell me how what I said is incorrect. Evolution is NOT small, continuous accumulation of chance mutations.
204 posted on 06/10/2003 2:25:49 PM PDT by metacognative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson