[Last Visible Dog]

And here you said they are, so, please which is it?

THINK!!! Unproven theories are the HEART of science therefore not outside the "purvey of science" even if the content of the theory is outside the current "purvey of science"

Clearly you argue to be argumentative

[Aric2000]

I argue to be argumentative?

So far you have responded to almost EVERY ONE of my posts, because for some odd reason, you ACTUALLY think that ID is science. When any scientist would look at it, and say. no evidence, no predictons, no nothing.

It is nonfalsifiable because god is used as it's MAIN causation. God is not scientific, and never has been.

Any theory that says "goddidit" is by definition, NON FALSIFIABLE. because you cannot prove nor disprove the existince of god.

Prove that god exists scientifically, then we can talk about god being used as a causation, but you can't.

Hint: god is a religious concept, there are NO facts to back up that god exists, it is a matter of faith, it is NOT scientific.

Again, ID has it's place, it is called philosophy religion, just as a lot of cosmological theories are more philisophical then they are scientific.

I argue to be argumentative? damn, talk about the pot calling the kettle black.