US sees likely al Qaeda WMD attack within 2 years

Reuters ^ | 06-09-03

[wayoverontheright]

There will always be those who don't want to be seen as complacent, I guess, also those who have an investment in keeping us fearful, because if we ever feel safe again, it's a tremendous victory for George W. Bush.

I don't think the al-Qaeda boys want to stick their hand in this hornet's nest again, and I know the "Arab street" is cautioning restraint.

[rface]

"pinged" for later reference

[Tolerance Sucks Rocks]

Pakistan (Yes, Pakistan)

Presumably in a brilliant campaign known as Operation Madrassa Basha!

[Tolerance Sucks Rocks]

They won't be getting any WMD from Iraq, we haven't been able to find any there, and that was supposed to be the mother of all WMD headquarters.

As I recall, we've checked about one-fourth of the places of concern regarding WMDs. Something could still turn up. No, I don't work out of the White House basement

[mombonn]

You are soooo tiresome.

[cardinal4]

let's all forget France

Agreed.

[LurkedLongEnough]

"You forgot Syria and France."

What about northern California and Oregon?

[cardinal4]

Georgie Porgie doesn't want a terrorist attack before Novermber 2004.

Damn, thats one moronic post!

[RightWhale]

CBRN

Can't say WMD amymore. Couldn't really say it anyway, so CBRN is an improvement. See-burn weapons.

[Monty22]

If they use a nuclear warhead on us, isn't it in the Pentagon's warplans to launch a retalitory strike of massive scale?

All the arab countries must be concerned that we have them targetted.