To: jammer
Al Queda had set up shop in Iraq until the U.S. military ran it out. Its leaders traveled to and from Baghdad planning evil and setting up the means to carry it out.
Iraqi fingers are in many terrorist pies from WTC1 to OKC to WTC2. They cannot be all explained away.
When a federal court finds Saddam financially liable for the WTC2 attack that is not just the fevered product of my imagination. It approaches what can be called a "fact."
In addition, the anthrax attacks will eventually be traced back to Iraq.
As far as the 2nd paragraph. To most people it does not matter if SH did not have WMD. He acted like it and that was good enough for any but chronic complainers.
162 posted on
06/10/2003 8:46:14 AM PDT by
justshutupandtakeit
(RATS will use any means to denigrate George Bush's Victory.)
To: justshutupandtakeit
"When a federal court finds Saddam financially liable for the WTC2 attack that is not just the fevered product of my imagination. It approaches what can be called a "fact." "
You mean that wacky liberal judge in NY, right? Are you aware of his other unconventional views?
I suggest google.
165 posted on
06/10/2003 8:55:51 AM PDT by
JohnGalt
(They're All Lying)
To: justshutupandtakeit
I was with you until you became uncivil in the last sentence. "Chronic complainers" don't justify your time and ad hominem arguments don't justify mine, so let's you and I drop it.
169 posted on
06/10/2003 9:22:31 AM PDT by
jammer
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson