No more mass executions. No new prisons for children. No bonus checks for the families of Palestinian suicide bombers. No Terrorism 101 classes at Salman Pak. No electrodes applied to the daughter of a man who talked to CNN. No daily potshots at allied aircraft. No sudden sluice of fear in the hearts of the Kurds when the government trucks appear on the horizon. No miserable thuggish satrapy in the middle of the Middle East, thumbing its nose at the United Nations and the United States.
Come election time 2004, the Iraqi oil proceeds will not be going to secret Swiss accounts named Chick Daney and Ronald Dumsfeld. They'll be going to the people of Iraq. We won't be arguing about losing the peace in Iraq.
We'll be arguing about losing the peace in Iran. But that's another story. For another presidential term.
This silly question is as cogent as the earlier ones, which were utterly destroyed as the mindless thoughts they were: How long will the war last?
How much will the war cost?
I'll start it off...
I have yet to meet a "progressive" who acted from an informed position.
Does that mean that none exist?
I have never seen nor heard of a "pacifist" who was normal.
Does that mean that none exist?
Meanwhile, another American soldier is dead and others have died recently in Afghanistan. If this isn't a slow-bleed quagmire with no light at the end of the tunnel, I don't know what is. Unfortunately, the predictions of the anti-war freepers (and more) are coming to pass.