[bjcintennessee]

I'm not certain that I understand where the boundaries are to be drawn. There have been so many changes in boundaries since the original Oslo Peace Accords(?) of 1948(?), that it is confusing as to where the legal boundaries should be, and who determines these boundaries. From what I have read, the Palestinians refused to accept the first attempt at establishing boundaries for Israel and Palestinian, so does that make the initial boundaries invalid?

And JSteff was right, Jordan doesn't want the Palestinians (and didn't I read here recently that Jordan's refugee camps threat the Palestians far worse than the Israeli's ever did?)

It occurs to me that we should go back to the original boundaries set by the original Oslo Accords and do whatever is necessary to enforce it. If that means American bombs falling on the Hamas, then so be it.

[bjcintennessee]

...refugee camps treat the Paslestians far worse...

I should proofread these things better.

[adam_az]

"It occurs to me that we should go back to the original boundaries set by the original Oslo Accords and do whatever is necessary to enforce it. If that means American bombs falling on the Hamas, then so be it."

Please tell me where those boundaries are?

Opps you can't because...

OSLO DIDN'T SET BOUNDARIES.

This was to be "final status negotiations"

How can so many people have such strong opinions about something they know so little about?