To: Lorianne
Personally, I'm insulted that Mrs. Clinton, the publishing industry, the media, et. al assume I am interested. I'm not. If you were, in fact, not interested in the "NEXT MONICA" you would not have downloaded this article and read it..... If you down loaded it by mistake you would not have responded to it. But you did both.
If you are going to post untruths about your interests in the Clinton's sex life, at least try to post untruths that are a tiny bit believable.
To: Common Tator
I am interesting in why we are supposed to be interested. I am NOT interested in Ms. Clinton's private affairs.
I feel the same why about celebrities. I can't understand why people are so involved in keeping up with the private lives of others. Why do people watch Jerry Springer? etc etc.
Don't they have their own lives?
It insults me that the media thinks we SHOULD be interested in all this salacious stuff. So much so that now we have these so-called "reality shows".
20 posted on
06/07/2003 4:04:29 PM PDT by
Lorianne
To: Common Tator
If you were, in fact, not interested in the "NEXT MONICA" you would not have downloaded this article and read it..... If you down loaded it by mistake you would not have responded to it. But you did both.
Point of order.
One does not download an article by clicking on an FR thread.
Downloading is when you save something from the 'Net to your hard drive.
80 posted on
06/07/2003 7:58:40 PM PDT by
Xenalyte
(I may not agree with your bumper sticker, but I'll defend to the death your right to stick it)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson