While Bush narrowly escaped being dragged into Enron
Just in case anybody is wondering how badly liberals are wanting Bush's scalp.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40 last
To: 11th Earl of Mar
"A president cannot stretch, twist or distort facts and get away with it." (John Dean) Coming in the wake of eight years of clinton maladministration, this sentence is a real howler!
34 posted on
06/07/2003 1:58:08 PM PDT by
Gritty
To: 11th Earl of Mar
Has John Dean forgotten the events of 9/11/01? GWB has all the authority he needs for the recent, and next, few wars against the islamofacists. GWB has done well in our fight against terrorism during his first term, and he did not seek this fight. I am confident GWB will be re-elected so as to continue the good fight.
To: 11th Earl of Mar
I see, now I get it. We should IMPEACH GW because he didn't USE faulty, sparadic and unrelated intelligence that somehow should have devined some sort of revalation to take preemptive action to STOP the WTC attack and once we do that we can IMPEACH GW for taking credible, specific and coordinated intelligence from MANY SOURCES including those from defectors and foriegn intelligence agencies, and using that to preemptively attack Iraq. Now it all makes perfect sense, I was confused BEFORE! Now I am ok!
38 posted on
06/07/2003 2:05:21 PM PDT by
PISANO
To: 11th Earl of Mar
Everyone knows where the WMD's are...
SYRIA But the President's strange obsession with rewarding Palestinian terrorists is not only keeping U.S. forces out of Syria, but letting them off the hook for meaningless words and gestures, and we are actually considering PAYING them $500 million to "dismantle" Hizbollah in Lebanon (yeah right, they'll do that). If we were true to the war on terror, the next stop would be the dimantle the Assad regime in Syria.
To: 11th Earl of Mar
REPUBLICANS = The FREEDOM Party
DEMOCRATS = The Anti-FREEDOM Party
41 posted on
06/07/2003 2:09:39 PM PDT by
ALOHA RONNIE
(Vet-Battle of IA DRANG-1965 www.LZXRAY.com)
To: 11th Earl of Mar
Unfortunately the Bush administration was duped by misleading foreign intelligence. This was done to pull us into this war. If our intelligence was so accurate inside Iraq as to pinpoint Iraqi military leaders going into meetings surely this intelligence could have pinpointed and followed the path of WMD. Afterall this was the number one reason for us entering this war. I am beyond being skeptical because it has taken this long to come up with any substantial evidence of WMD. The only chance this administration has now of getting out of this mess is to plant the evidence which will be have to carefully thought out before implementing.
42 posted on
06/07/2003 2:24:46 PM PDT by
doc
To: 11th Earl of Mar
...and I repeat WHAT SCANDAL?!?!?! This should not even be an issue. The Dem/Liberals are sooo desperate.
To: 11th Earl of Mar
Just in case anybody is wondering how badly liberals are wanting Bush's scalp.Beyond pathetic. These people need professional help.
49 posted on
06/07/2003 2:57:36 PM PDT by
kesg
To: 11th Earl of Mar
They have to prove Iraq didn't have WMDs first. Then, if they prove that, they have to prove that Bush wasn't duped himself. But, I don't think they can prove either of the two things I just said.
50 posted on
06/07/2003 3:01:28 PM PDT by
Sparta
(Tagline removed by moderator)
To: 11th Earl of Mar
Dean quotes the thoroughly discredited Guardian story about Paul Wolfowitz and the "sea of oil". Even the Guardian retracted the story on Thursday. Yet Dean wrote this piece on Friday and should have known full well the story had been wtihdrawn.
The guy has no business talking about credibility or lies when he repeats them himself.
And citing Krugman and Dowd as sources? Gee, why did he leave out Molly Ivins?
To: 11th Earl of Mar
HaHa!!!! What a joke. Where are the dems who said that Saddam had WMDs?
54 posted on
06/07/2003 5:53:59 PM PDT by
dalebert
To: 11th Earl of Mar
To: 11th Earl of Mar
Someone pleeeze dig up some dirt on Dean to keep him busy elsewhere.
58 posted on
06/07/2003 9:05:50 PM PDT by
ampat
To: 11th Earl of Mar
![](http://www.camineet.net/ps2cast/e-john.jpg) |
![](http://www.musarium.com/WATERGATE/IMAGES/2_johndean.jpg) |
Elton John
|
John Dean
|
59 posted on
06/07/2003 10:45:28 PM PDT by
tictoc
(On FreeRepublic, discussion is a contact sport.)
To: 11th Earl of Mar
john dean was, of course, the first rat off of dick nixon's sinking ship.
radio kfi this afternoon was advertising dean as a "republican" and devoted a lot of time to the coming impeachment of bush. you heard it first on kfi, they said.
60 posted on
06/07/2003 10:50:00 PM PDT by
liberalnot
(what democrats fear the most is democracy .)
To: 11th Earl of Mar
SHOULD SENATE DEMOCRATS REFUSE TO CONFIRM ALL BUSH SUPREME COURT NOMINEES? REFLECTIONS ON PROFESSOR ACKERMANS PROPOSAL
By JOHN DEAN
Meanwhile, in anticipation, a distinguished constitutional scholar and Yale law professor, Bruce Ackerman, has called upon the Senate to withhold its advice and consent for any and all Supreme Court nominations by President George W. Bush. Ackermans proposal has created a bit of buzz in Washington, and when, a few days ago, it was editorially embraced by the Boston Globe, I starting thinking about its viability.
http://writ.news.findlaw.com/dean/20010427.html
62 posted on
06/07/2003 11:46:17 PM PDT by
TLBSHOW
(the gift is to see the truth)
To: 11th Earl of Mar
"Just in case anybody is wondering how badly liberals are wanting Bush's scalp"
Well-known to those of us who search out the truth. Unfortunately, there are many people who have little time or access to anything other than liberal media. I try to share what I learn on the internet with people who mostly rely on ABC, CBS, NBC for their news.
It may be worthwhile to print out and distribute the type of info much of the public doesn't get prior to the election. My mother only gets a liberal newspaper, basic tv channels and neither my brother or I have been able to convince her that the Democrats are lying.
65 posted on
06/08/2003 12:36:40 AM PDT by
Susannah
(Veterans...the most treasured and endangered ones)
To: 11th Earl of Mar
Anyone mind if I question Dean's patriotism? Also:
A president cannot stretch, twist or distort facts and get away with it. President Lyndon Johnson's distortions of the truth about Vietnam forced him to stand down from reelection. President Richard Nixon's false statements about Watergate forced his resignation. Dean conveniently omits recent history of President Bill Clinton lying under oath. Obviously a president can get away with flat out lying if he's brazen enough and selfish enough to put himself above the interests of the nation.
To: 11th Earl of Mar
The liberals want Bush bad and will focus on anything. Unless WMD are truly found (We know they had them, either they are in another country
*COUGH* IRAN AND SYRIA *COUGH* or they were destroyed). Either way, expect this to be a very very big issue next year.
I don't think Dean comparing this to Johnson was a good comparison. Johnson and company basically fabricated or blew out of proportion a lot of things so they could ramp up and get into nation building, errr defeating those pesky communists, and the press helped them without questioning any of it. Whatever Johnson and his boys said was reported as fact. Look at Reagan or either Bush in the WH, whatever they say is picked over with a fine-toothed comb and reported as "supposedly" or "reported", etc. I have to keep reminding myself that the media is not biased ;-)
To: 11th Earl of Mar
For some reason I printed out an AP article on 10 Oct 02, containing the text of the resolution passed by the House-- "Joint Resolution to Authorize the use of United States Armed Forces Against Iraq" and read the whereases again just now. Seems clear enough that the House and the Senate wanted this.
76 posted on
06/10/2003 10:31:46 AM PDT by
RightWhale
(gazing at shadows)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson