Posted on 06/07/2003 5:43:07 AM PDT by runningbear
Death certificates opened for Laci Peterson and son
Posted on Sat, Jun. 07, 2003
Death certificates opened for Laci Peterson and son
By Brian Anderson and Claire Booth
CONTRA COSTA TIMES
MODESTO - The Contra Costa County Coroner's Office could not determine a cause of death for Laci Peterson, but concluded that her son was born dead.
The coroner lists Peterson's manner of death as homicide. Death certificates for the 27-year-old and the son with whom she was eight months pregnant were made public late Friday.
A judge agreed earlier in the day to allow release of the documents, but kept sealed the results of the two autopsies.
During two hours of courtroom wrangling, Stanislaus County Superior Court Judge Al Girolami told Scott Peterson's defense lawyers and the prosecutors who have charged him with the murders of his wife and child that the report will remain sealed until a preliminary hearing.
The death certificates were filed in Contra Costa County on Friday. Signed April 21, they are the official record of Laci and Conner Peterson's deaths.
The filings do not mean the remains will be released to Laci Peterson's family. A court order requires the coroner's office to retain custody of the remains until told otherwise by a judge, said coroner's spokesman Jimmy Lee.
Laci Peterson's family does not know when that will be, said family spokeswoman Kim Petersen. "It's a very tough time for them," she said Friday.
The death certificates contain the time and place of death. For Laci Peterson, the coroner's office specifies the date she was found on the Richmond shoreline, April 14.
Conner Peterson was found a day earlier. That is specified on his fetal death certificate, along with where he was found along the Richmond shoreline. Fetal death certificates have no category for a cause of death. Conner's does specify that he was born dead.
Cable news station MSNBC reported last week that a leaked portion of the autopsy reports showed that Conner was found with 11/2 loops of tape around his neck.
Legal analysts have surmised the information could be used to back a defense theory that a satanic cult played a role in Laci Peterson's disappearance and slaying.
It also was widely believed that the defense team had a hand in leaking the autopsy to bolster its case with the public, an allegation attorney Mark Geragos adamantly denied.
The autopsy had been sealed May 15 at the request of both defense attorneys and prosecutors. After last week's leak, the Stanislaus County District Attorney's Office asked that the entire report be unsealed.
Deputy district attorney David Harris told Girolami on Friday the leaked details provided a "significant slant" in favor of the defense. "We can't discuss inaccuracies or accuracies without violating the court order," he said.
Girolami said the results will not be unsealed. "I don't think that releasing the report at this time is necessary. The mere fact that someone has leaked out part of the report does not justify releasing all of it."
In other matters, Girolami told lawyers for 22 reporters that a state law does not protect calls and conversations they placed to Scott Peterson. Authorities wiretapped Peterson's phone before his arrest and alerted journalists last month that they had been taped.
Scott Peterson, 30, was arrested April 18. His wife, who was eight months pregnant, vanished Dec. 23 or 24 from her Modesto home.
Peterson could be executed if convicted;..................................
-----------------------------------------------------------
Autopsies Kept Sealed in Laci Peterson Case
Autopsies Kept Sealed in Laci Peterson Case
Fri June 6, 2003 07:19 PM ET
By Tim Wimborne
MODESTO, Calif. (Reuters) - A judge refused on Friday to make public graphic autopsy reports for Laci Peterson and her unborn son, rebuffing press efforts to unseal key documents in a murder case that has riveted the nation.
The parents of the 27-year-old substitute teacher left the Stanislaus County courtroom when Superior Court Judge Al Girolami began discussing whether to release the autopsy, grim details of which have already surfaced in media reports.
Laci's husband, Scott Peterson, 30, who is charged with two murders and could face the death penalty if convicted, has pleaded not guilty.
During the autopsy discussion, Peterson, who has shown little emotion during the proceedings, dabbed his eyes with a tissue and appeared grim-faced, swallowing hard several times.
"This is not about adverse publicity," Peterson's attorney Mark Geragos told the court in opposing the release of the autopsies. "I'm worried about my client's life."
Geragos has argued against releasing many of the documents in the case, saying that to do so would increase the already high public hostility toward his client.
Judge Girolami said leaks to the press of some details from the coroner's reports were not a justification to release the entire document. Prosecutors in the case had withdrawn their objections to the report's release.
The judge, however, refused to authorize a gag order on lawyers in the case and authorized the Contra Costa County coroner to prepare and release death certificates for Laci and her unborn son, that might list a cause of death.
Officials have not publicly stated how they believe Laci Peterson died, and have released few details of the case they have against Peterson.
WASHED ASHORE
The two decaying corpses washed out of San Francisco Bay in April, prompting Peterson's arrest. Coroners worked for weeks on the bodies, saying the advanced state of decomposition made their job especially difficult.
A law enforcement official told Reuters on Friday that plastic was wrapped in the area of the neck of the unborn baby when it was found along the Contra Costa high-tide shoreline, but said it could well have been from trash rather than a clue to the murder.
"There is a lot of junk in the sea, maybe that's what it is," the official said.
San Francisco television station KTVU quoted law enforcement sources on Friday as saying Laci Peterson may have been drugged with a so-called date rape drug to weaken her before being strangled........
--------------------------------------------------------------
Media Won't Hear Scott Peterson Wiretaps
Media Won't Hear Scott Peterson Wiretaps
Judge Rejects Reporters' Requests to Hear Wiretaps of Husband in Laci Peterson Murder Case
The Associated Press
MODESTO, Calif. June 6 —
The judge in the Laci Peterson murder case on Friday rejected requests by reporters to listen to wiretaps of phone calls they made to Scott Peterson.
Attorneys representing 22 reporters had asked to review to tapes of their calls to Peterson so they could determine if they might be barred from becoming evidence.
The lawyers said those conversations were protected under the California Shield Law, which protects reporters from turning over unpublished work. They claimed the wiretaps are the same as journalists' notes.
But Stanislaus County Superior Court Judge Al Girolami said he did not think journalists were entitled to any privilege protecting their phone calls. He did, however, delay for 10 days the release of the tapes.
Girolami's ruling came during the first hour of a hearing in which he also set a June 19 date to rule on defense motions regarding wiretaps of Peterson's calls. The judge was also expected to begin considering a prosecution motion to unseal results of an autopsy on the bodies of Laci Peterson and her unborn son, Conner.
Scott Peterson's lawyers want the judge to dismiss the prosecutors assigned to the case and to toss out the results of two wiretaps that monitored thousands of Peterson's calls after the disappearance of his pregnant wife, Laci.
During the court-approved wiretaps, the first of which began two weeks after Laci Peterson vanished when investigators thought they had exhausted normal evidence-gathering techniques, police logged 3,858 phone calls made to her husband, according to court papers.
Some of those conversations will be questioned by defense lawyers, who claim police eavesdropped on protected conversations between Scott Peterson and his lawyer.
Girolami will also consider issuing a gag order to prevent evidence leaks in the case and he may decide whether to release autopsy results of Laci Peterson and her unborn son. Prosecutors have said they support some form of a gag order, while defense lawyer Mark Geragos said in court paper that he opposes any effort to curtail discussions about the case.
Peterson, 30, has pleaded innocent to two counts of murder for ....................
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Judge keeps documents sealed in Peterson case
Judge keeps documents sealed in Peterson case
BEE STAFF REPORTS
Published: June 6, 2003, 12:49:07 PM PDT
A judge kept under wraps many documents and other evidence in the Peterson double-murder case Friday. During a discussion of autopsy reports, defendant Scott Peterson - who is charged with killing his pregnant wife, Laci, and their unborn son, Conner - dabbed his eyes with a handkerchief.
Stanislaus County Superior Court Judge Al Girolami:
Kept sealed autopsy reports on both bodies.
Ordered the Contra Costa County coronor’s office to issue death certificates.
Kept sealed wiretap recordings. He allowed prosecutors and defense attorneys to get copies of the tapes, but temporarily prohibited the handing over of calls between Peterson and journalists. Prosecutors also are not allowed to hear calls between Peterson and his defense team.
Delayed a decision on a potential gag order preventing principals ...................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Excerpt) Read more at bayarea.com ...
You're really not having a good day, are you? Forget your meds, this a.m.?
If a defense witness has made a prior statement to the papers which is exculpatory for Scott, and then the witness changes that story at trial, either due to pressure from LE, the media, or some other reason, the defense would want to impeach that witness.
For instance, there were newspaper accounts of at least two people who claimed to have seen Laci walking the dog that morning. If they have now decided they were mistaken or recant in some other way, the defense would surely want to get this into evidence.
I don't know if the rules would let them do this, but I would sure give it a try if I were playing defense.
If the defense can place a living Laci anywhere after Scott claims to have left for Berkeley, his opportunity to kill her is greatly diminished. Remember he has a parking receipt for the Berkeley Marina, which presumably has a time stamp on it. It would be very, very difficult to drive back to Modesto, kill Laci, dump her in the bay, and drive back to Modesto in one afternoon.
The defense only has to sow doubt & confusion in the mind of one juror.
1. The bodies turned up right near the place he said he visited on the 24th. Witnesses can place him at that place, but apparently none of them can say how long he was really there.
2. His strange behavior--and it was VERY guilty-looking--after the fact.
3. The fact that one phone tap caught him saying to Amber, "I didn't do it, but I know who did, and I'll tell you when we're together later."
4. There seems to be no other suspect for whom a link with Laci can be discerned.
As true as #1 is, I doubt that LE can place the time of submergence of the bodies any closer than two weeks. If someone else did it, the bay would become the obvious dumping point.
As for #2, I only had to read the story of Sam Sheppard once to realize how LE can absolutely devastate a man's life after a trajedy perpetrated by someone else.
If my wife is ever the victim of any crime, I am going to insist on every constitutional right I have. Sam Sheppard was a well respected doctor, a man of means and position in his community and LE cut him down wrongfully despite all the "advantages" that his education and position should hve given him.
As for #3, Scott is a known liar and braggard. This is completely in character.
As far as I can see, there really isn't any hard evidence, which has come to the attention of the public, making this an open-and-shut case.
In fact, for every accusation there is a perfectly innocent explanation. Why do we need so many explanarions? Well, if LE was scrutinizing my life for a given period and every time I satisfied them on some point, they came up with another accusation there would be a lot of accusations and misinterpretations.
I am not saying he is innocent, but there is no hard evidence of guilt as you correctly state.
we have recently heard that he told Amy Rocha (when he saw her in late afternoon at the hair salon) that he had an 8:00 tee time the next day (the 24th) at the local golf course.
Who among us has never lied to an in-law?
To keep the peace. Over haircuts, dresses and house paint. What's the use in SP lying about his going golfing vs. his going fishing? In any case, he probably forgot to cancel his tee time and the pro shop records will make it to court.
Very few golfers bring home ugly, scaly, slimy critters and expect their wives to cook them.
I live in the south, and people do prune and give their plants/shrubs nourishment in the fall of the year. I really don't know about that specific area around Modesta, CA.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.