[Egregious Philbin]

Bleeding heart liberals have been replaced with bleeding heart conservatives. Practical concerns about whether or not Iraq represented a real threat to the United States before the war are to be brushed off, the retort being an appeal to emotion. Sure, Saddam was/is an evil tyrant, but was/is he an evil tyrant that is a danger to us? If you want to prevent mass graves, then we should be joining French troops in the Congo right now.

[MizSterious]

But would congress okay the budget for all the white flags? I mean, if we're going to join the French...

;)

[24-7Freeper]

"What's that you say, Mr. Blix?.. You say Iraq has NO Weapon of Mass Destruction, eh??

(ahem) "Ha, Ha, YES That's right, Bahgdad Bob! Iraq has no Weapons of Mass Destruction!!"

Oh very good Mr. Blix!! Thats Right Mr Blix!! There you see?... We have NO Weapons of Mass Destruction!

"Ha, Ha, Thank you Bahgdad Bob!!"....   No, Thank YOU Mr. Blix!

[My2Cents]

Bush is the one prosecuting this nation's war on terror. He deemed it vital to take out Saddam as part of that war. You may disagreed. Fine. Vote against him. I trust Bush and the way he's prosecuting the WOT, and have seen nothing in the rhetoric of the naysayers to withdraw that trust.

[Registered]

"If you want to prevent mass graves, then we should be joining French troops in the Congo right now."

I want you to know, that I received an email from a local Democratic "activist" group, and you know what? They said the exact same thing as you. Do you happen to write on the side?