Skip to comments.
CIA to Give Congress Documents on Iraq Intelligence (most are classified)
FOxNews ^
| Jne 5, 2003
| FoxNews
Posted on 06/05/2003 5:23:48 PM PDT by FairOpinion
Edited on 04/22/2004 12:36:29 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
WASHINGTON
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: congress; documents; hearings; intelligence; iraq; iraqsurveygroup; weapons; wmd
Note: most documents are CLASSIFIED. This article is highly recommended for all those, who thought that public hearings ( where for obvious reasons classified data can NOT be presented) are a good idea, just because the Democrats say so, whose agenda is NOT getting at the truth, but use the hearings as a public forum to make vile accusations against President Bush.
See earlier article about Congressional Hearings:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/922540/posts
To: FairOpinion
Will Leahy be included?
-PJ
To: FairOpinion
Maybe this will clear up the forged nuclear documents.
3
posted on
06/05/2003 5:27:59 PM PDT
by
ex-snook
(American jobs need balanced trade - WE BUY FROM YOU, YOU BUY FROM US)
To: Political Junkie Too
Good question. In addition to Leaky Leahy, there are many others who simply cannot be trusted with classified info. Mostly those with "D"s after their name.
4
posted on
06/05/2003 5:29:31 PM PDT
by
cardinal4
(The Senate Armed Services Comm; the Chinese pipeline into US secrets)
To: cardinal4
And finally they start to point out the history:
"On Wednesday, Undersecretary of Defense for Policy Doug Feith (search) told doubters that the intelligence used was not only credible, but dated back several years.
"These judgments were based on intelligence reports that not only went back years, but pre-dated this administration," Feith said in a rare appearance before reporters. "In February 1998, [former President] Clinton said Iraq continues to conceal weapons of mass destruction and weapons that can deliver them. The intelligence community's judgments on weapons of mass destruction did not undergo major changes between Clinton-Gore and this administration."
To: FairOpinion
The intelligence community's judgments on weapons of mass destruction did not undergo major changes between Clinton-Gore and this administrationBut its Clinton Gore drones who are complaining the loudest about us not finding them.....yet! Remember dirtpotus's cruise missile waste, excuse me, attack on the Baghdad Mukhabarat? Right around the time Monica was testifying? The big speech about NBC?? The hypocrisy of the left knows no bounds.
6
posted on
06/05/2003 5:39:35 PM PDT
by
cardinal4
(The Senate Armed Services Comm; the Chinese pipeline into US secrets)
To: FairOpinion
As soon as Congress sees these documents, our human assets in Iraq are all dead and we'll get to start building our humintel over there from scratch -- with the added disadvantage that everybody who might be willing to help us will know that they will die for doing so. As I've said before, the worst enemy America has is the democratic party.
7
posted on
06/05/2003 5:45:20 PM PDT
by
Bonaparte
To: FairOpinion
"...including sources' names ..."
Anyone want to start a pool on how long after the documents are received that the names appear as headlines in the New York Slimes?
To: leprechaun9
They will -- along with their addresses and photos of them, their spouses, their children, their grandchildren and their great grandchildren. Oh, did I leave out their parents, grandparents and cousins?
9
posted on
06/05/2003 6:02:30 PM PDT
by
Bonaparte
To: FairOpinion
most are classified Wonder how long it will take Leaky Lahey to live up to his sobriquet?
10
posted on
06/05/2003 6:05:15 PM PDT
by
jimkress
To: jimkress
Leaky Leahy was removed from the Intell committee, but I still expect to see classified material about Iraq on The Drudge Report within ten days of Congress getting it.
11
posted on
06/05/2003 6:30:13 PM PDT
by
jimtorr
To: FairOpinion
Now'd be a fine time to out some of these idiots. You want to see it? You have to be cleared to see it. Do the background work and announce who can't be trusted with the info. Now just how'd that play with the folks at home knowing their particular Rep or Senator isn't to be trusted with info regarding the security of the country. There'd be Hell to pay come election time now wouldn't there?
12
posted on
06/05/2003 6:31:42 PM PDT
by
SCHROLL
To: Bonaparte
"As I've said before, the worst enemy America has is the democratic party. "
---
I completely agree. It is too bad that not everyone is as perceptive as you are.
To: FairOpinion; Bonaparte
"As I've said before, the worst enemy America has is the democratic party. " It's the democRAT party. There is nothing democratic about them.
14
posted on
06/06/2003 6:19:00 AM PDT
by
jimkress
To: jimkress
The "demagogic party" would describe them also.
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson