To: CanisMajor2002
The GOP got a BUNCH of help in bolstering the economy because those lower income workers SPENDDDDDD that $400 per child immediately goosing the ecomomy RIGHT NOW.
To: Uncle George
Sooooo $400 gooses the economy??? Doing what??? It's not a blip on the radar screen...IMO.
34 posted on
06/05/2003 12:22:13 PM PDT by
Ga Rob
("Life's tough...it's even tougher when you're stupid"....The Duke)
To: Uncle George
We're supply siders. We aren't allowed to believe that increased consumption benefits the economy-- throwing dollar bills out of planes, and all that jazz.
54 posted on
06/05/2003 12:31:40 PM PDT by
GraniteStateConservative
(Putting government in charge of morality is like putting pedophiles in charge of children.)
To: Uncle George
Only good point. The precedent is awful, however. I have visions of Caesar mounting his chariot with bags of gold, riding among the poor to curry favor.
To: Uncle George
"The GOP got a BUNCH of help in bolstering the economy because those lower income workers SPENDDDDDD that $400 per child immediately goosing the ecomomy RIGHT NOW. "
Guess Nike must be happy, thats two pairs of running shoes isn't it? (Thats what these so called poor deprived starving people all seem to wear $200 shoes)
To: Uncle George
"The GOP got a BUNCH of help in bolstering the economy because those lower income workers SPENDDDDDD that $400 per child immediately goosing the ecomomy RIGHT NOW."
It would be most efficiently spent if left in the hands of the person that earned it.
To: Uncle George
The GOP got a BUNCH of help in bolstering the economy because those lower income workers SPENDDDDDD that $400 per child immediately goosing the ecomomy RIGHT NOWHow does taking $400 from you (so that you don't spend it, obviously) and giving it to somebody else (after deducting Federal carrying charges) result in a net economic gain?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson