Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: section9
RE #13

The defensive strategu of S. Korea and U.S. until mid-70's was to retreat to the south of Han river and regroup and counterattack, upon N. Korean invasion.

Then it was changed to a new strategy of holding the position near DMZ and push them back without any retreat.

Now America changes its strategy again. This time pulls her ground force from DMZ to the safer area to the south. It will skip the part of retreating and regrouping altogether. American troops appear to be positioned as a main counterattack force while the S. Korean ground force will do the work of wearing down the initial thrust of N. Korean troops.

This is how it looks on the surface. But under the current context, the relocation could be also for the pre-emptive attack if it becomes necessary. As I said, it is an implied threat to N. Korea, which will be duly noted by all players, including N. Korea.

17 posted on 06/05/2003 7:47:53 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: TigerLikesRooster
No matter what the Americans do, it will be viewed as a "threat" by the North Koreans.
20 posted on 06/05/2003 8:11:11 AM PDT by Guillermo (Proud Infidel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Bump. If NK truly has almost completed reprocessing those fuel rods, we may be moving closer to an active response. Cheney recently gave a speech and said that we wouldn't seek to "contain" enemies, but to annihilate them. Are we really going to let psychotic Kim threaten to use and sell his nukes?
36 posted on 06/05/2003 11:56:05 AM PDT by jerseygirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson