Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Birth by Design: Are Celebs Too Posh to Push?
Fox News ^ | June 4, 2003 | Jennifer D'Angelo

Posted on 06/04/2003 1:17:53 PM PDT by Canticle_of_Deborah

NEW YORK — Celebs — as usual on the leading edge — are rumored to be at the forefront of a growing movement among new moms: pre-scheduled, elective Caesarean sections (search).

Some have accused stars such as Victoria “Posh Spice” Beckham, Claudia Schiffer, Elizabeth Hurley and Madonna of endangering their babies for vanity by choosing early C-sections over old-fashioned childbirth in order to avoid abdominal stretching.

“There has been a spike in these designer C-sections in England and Scotland,” said syndicated columnist Michelle Malkin. “[Celebrities] put themselves and their unborn children at risk to avoid stretch marks.”

Tabloids have nicknamed the movement "Too Posh to Push," after former Spice Girl Beckham. The British beauty, like all of the accused stars who commented in various reports, claimed she had her C-sections under doctors’ orders.

But there's been persistent speculation on the subject recently. "There have always been rumors that some celebrities, in their desire to keep a streamlined form, push for an early C-section as a way to avoid the final month of major abdominal stretching," wrote Anne Marie Owens (search) in an article in The National Post earlier this year that was reprinted in several newspapers.

In spite of the controversy, many doctors say C-sections — often perceived as a last-resort way to bring a child into the world — may be preferable to vaginal delivery.

“If you want to look at what is the absolute safest [way to give birth], C-section without labor on an elective schedule basis avoids all possible issues," said Scott Serden, clinical chief of obstetrics and gynecology at Cedars-Sinai Hospital in Los Angeles, where many celebrities, including Madonna, have given birth.

"There are studies out of England showing a lower incidence of neurological trauma with elective surgery as opposed to those who go through labor. And it’s nicer and safer for the mother to give birth on a pre-scheduled basis, as opposed to at 3 a.m."

Serden added that he hasn't heard of patients giving birth early to avoid stretch marks, but confirmed that the hospital performs elective C-sections, and not only on celebs.

“More women are choosing not to go through the labor process, to avoid issues with vaginal delivery and the possible long process of labor induction,” he said.

Dr. Yehudi Gordon, who delivered model Kate Moss’ baby and is called the “ob-gyn to the stars” in London, told Foxnews.com that he has not discussed performing these procedures for cosmetic reasons with any of his patients.

The number of women having C-sections has been on the rise, and in 2001, the most recent year for which stats are available, 24.4 percent of births in the United States were Caesareans, the highest rate in 13 years, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

The American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (search) says deliveries should not be performed prior to 39 weeks without a medical reason. After 39 weeks, women are usually all clear for a C-section, but Serden said there's no point doing it for cosmetic reasons.

"If the abdominal walls are going to stretch, by this point they already have," he said.

But Dr. Marciana Wilkerson, an ob-gyn at George Washington University Hospital in Washington, D.C., said C-sections can prevent stretch marks that appear in the last few weeks of pregnancy.

"Two weeks can make all the difference," said Wilkerson, who added that she got stretch marks in the last two weeks of her term.

But if A-listers are giving birth a month early, that could endanger the health of the baby.

"Before two weeks, if it's just for social and not medical reasons, you put your child at risk unnecessarily," said Wilkerson.

And C-sections are not without risks. According to childbirth.org, risks to the mother include infection, increased blood loss, respiratory complications and a longer hospital stay and recovery time. Risks to the baby include premature birth, breathing problems and fetal injury.

For women concerned with sexy stomachs, old-fashioned pushing avoids scarring, whereas C-sections, which involve a surgical incision through the abdominal wall and uterus, do not.

Scars, however, can be cleaned up with plastic surgery.

Regardless, Malkin said six-pack abs should be the last thing on a woman's mind when she's giving birth.

“When you make a decision to have a child, it's a sacrifice. If they are not willing, they shouldn’t have children,” she said.


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 06/04/2003 1:17:54 PM PDT by Canticle_of_Deborah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Canticle_of_Deborah
“When you make a decision to have a child, it's a sacrifice. If they are not willing, they shouldn’t have children,” she said.



I'm sure Madonna really understands that concept! If any of these women lost their riches tomorrow, they would be in their own personal hell having to care for their children on their own! I always get a laugh at expectant mothers of the middle class gawking and admiring these superstar phonies! They admire that they look great 8 weeks after birth, of course they forget the part where they had a personal trainer, nanny, etc ie nothing has changed with their lives at all! I think all of us gals would look great with a full service daycare and fitness crew in our home right after birth of our children!
2 posted on 06/04/2003 1:25:33 PM PDT by glory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Canticle_of_Deborah
I'm sure the same celebs neglect their nutrition during the pregnancy by 'dieting' to maintain their figures. Combined with early birthing, it pretty much guarantees the children will be as deficient as their parents. Far better for these folks to adopt- no stretch marks, no scars.
3 posted on 06/04/2003 1:39:54 PM PDT by Lil'freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Canticle_of_Deborah
Horrible. I know someone who had an elective C-section at 39 weeks (because she had a previous section) and whoops! The baby's lungs weren't developed and the baby spent a week in the NICU. The verdict was that either the dates were wrong or this baby's lungs just needed that extra week to develop.

And C-section recovery for women is so much worse compared to vaginal birth.

About stretch marks: only half of women get them at all, and it's not true that they primarily appear in the final two weeks. More like the final two months.

Gosh, people are so vain. My stretch marks are my badge of motherhood; and besides, they've faded to silver and are barely visible now.

Motherhood is a sacrifice but raising my three boys is the best thing I've ever done in my life. . .
4 posted on 06/04/2003 1:40:03 PM PDT by olivia3boys
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Canticle_of_Deborah
too posh to push
5 posted on 06/04/2003 2:50:08 PM PDT by SMEDLEYBUTLER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: olivia3boys
If I were to be blessed with another pregnancy, I would insist on a C-section. My first as a C-section and the second was induced. After the last one, there is NO WAY I would go through that again, or put my baby through it. As far as I figure it, let the little tyke stay put as long as possible, then, when labor starts, visit the OR. Some of us weren't made to deliver babies.
6 posted on 06/04/2003 3:08:51 PM PDT by Marie (If poor spelling is an indicator of a brilliant mind, then I'm a total genious.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SMEDLEYBUTLER
I swear I did a search and nothing came up!
7 posted on 06/04/2003 3:11:29 PM PDT by Canticle_of_Deborah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: olivia3boys

About stretch marks: only half of women get them at all, and it's not true that they primarily appear in the final two weeks. More like the final two months.



I've had five kids, one a 12 pounder, and not a single stretch mark.
8 posted on 06/04/2003 3:14:22 PM PDT by It's me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: olivia3boys
Horrible. I know someone who had an elective C-section at 39 weeks (because she had a previous section) and whoops! The baby's lungs weren't developed and the baby spent a week in the NICU. The verdict was that either the dates were wrong or this baby's lungs just needed that extra week to develop.

Yes. I had a friend who badgered her doctor into giving her a C-Section because she didn't like giving birth. He finally relented. When they did the C-Section the ob and the pediatrician were horrified to discover the baby was much younger than calculated. They said out loud they never should have done it.

And C-section recovery for women is so much worse compared to vaginal birth.

I agree. I have another friend who has three kids, the last one C-Sectioned. After the first two she was outside raking leaves the next day! Now, I probably would never be that tough or advocate that, but she is pretty strong!

9 posted on 06/04/2003 3:17:53 PM PDT by Canticle_of_Deborah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Marie
Some people really do need C-Sections. They should have them. The criticism these days is directed at doctors who do it for convenience and women who do it for likewise selfish reasons.
10 posted on 06/04/2003 3:20:36 PM PDT by Canticle_of_Deborah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: It's me
I've had five kids, one a 12 pounder, and not a single stretch mark.

:-p

11 posted on 06/04/2003 3:22:06 PM PDT by Canticle_of_Deborah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Canticle_of_Deborah
actually it is safer for both mother and baby to have natural childbirth. for moms, surgery is dangerous. for babies, coming thru the birth canal squeezes out fluid from the lung, and also there is less risk in delivery prematurely.

that said, most celebrities are "elderly primips". For women over 35 who are having their first baby, the rate of Caesarian sections is quite high even if you give them a trial of labor. So there is a good argument that elective caesarian section is indicated for these "elderly" celebrities...
12 posted on 06/04/2003 3:41:03 PM PDT by LadyDoc (liberals only love politically correct poor people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LadyDoc
actually it is safer for both mother and baby to have natural childbirth. for moms, surgery is dangerous

That's always been my understanding.

For women over 35 who are having their first baby, the rate of Caesarian sections is quite high even if you give them a trial of labor.

Why?

13 posted on 06/04/2003 4:05:58 PM PDT by Canticle_of_Deborah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Canticle_of_Deborah
This is the original that Fox referenced in their report.
14 posted on 06/04/2003 5:21:56 PM PDT by SMEDLEYBUTLER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Canticle_of_Deborah
It's too late! Rosie O'Donnell is already pretty stretched.

EEEEK! I used "Rosie O'Donnell" and "pretty" in the same sentence! Hock, ptui! Ptui!

15 posted on 06/04/2003 5:30:36 PM PDT by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

To: Canticle_of_Deborah
I tell ya what... if my wife and I expect a baby on January 1st, we are having a c-section done the day before on December 31, so we can claim the baby for the entire year as a deduction. I am that kinda sentimentalist ;)
17 posted on 06/04/2003 5:53:52 PM PDT by dogbyte12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IcelandicConservative
Wow. I can honestly say that reason never entered my mind before you said it:-)
18 posted on 06/04/2003 8:27:06 PM PDT by Canticle_of_Deborah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: dogbyte12
May you have many happy tax returns;-)
19 posted on 06/04/2003 8:27:48 PM PDT by Canticle_of_Deborah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Canticle_of_Deborah
After I delivered my first born---a 10 pound 91/2 ounce bouncing baby boy, I asked my OB how soon could I use tampons again, and he responded that he didn't want anything in me ---foreign or domestic--- for at least six weeks. LOL
20 posted on 06/04/2003 8:46:12 PM PDT by matchgirl (The gobbelins 'll git cha if ya don't watch out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson