I just realized, you are like a spoiled child who fusses when he has nothing to say in his defense.
Your first words towards me on this thread were in accusation, instead of logical explaination.
Your last five replies were basically fuss, fuss, fuss.
Your replies have basically been politically correct (attack, attack, attack and ignore any logic from the other side of the arguement).
While MY replies and statements have been polite and unpolitically correct in that they use LOGIC and REASON.
Now either you can say something reasoned and logical, or go crawl back under your rock.
You flatter yourself Paul. I don't need a "defense" because I'm not the one claiming conjecture is proof. You speaking of Logic is laughable as you obviously don't know "correlation does not prove causation"...one of the fundimentals of Logic.
My last five replies do nothing but pin down the fact you are unable produce the proof you claim. And the best your obviouly limited intellectual ability can respond with is a variation on "I know you are, but what am I."
I don't know about what they call "polite" in your trailer park, but where I'm from telling someone repeatedly to "shut up" and ad hominim defense does not qualify. My belligerence is born of your intransigence.
Tell me, what exactly does Jamie Lee Curtis' genetic anomaly prove? Her behavior is atypical from other women in what way? Do you ever assess an anecdote critically?