Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Stewart Expected In NYC Court Today-12 Noon ET [perp walk]
ABC News and The Drudge Report ^ | June 4, 2003 | Matt Drudge

Posted on 06/04/2003 8:32:56 AM PDT by ewing

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last
To: ewing
As least Martha is sucking all of the wind out of Hillarys book..

An appropriate verb to use when discussing anything Clintonian.

41 posted on 06/04/2003 9:15:14 AM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


42 posted on 06/04/2003 9:16:19 AM PDT by SMEDLEYBUTLER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: homeschool mama
Martha is 62!!
43 posted on 06/04/2003 9:22:50 AM PDT by ewing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
Her company employs 50,000 workers. Hopefully the Federales won't try and shut that down like they did with Arthur Anderson.
44 posted on 06/04/2003 9:23:33 AM PDT by ambrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Wed Jun 4, 2:55 PM ET

Martha Stewart (news - web sites) arrives at the federal courthouse in Manhattan on Wednesday, June 4, 2003, in this image from video. A grand jury indicted Stewart on federal charges of securities fraud and obstruction of justice Wednesday in an insider stock trading scandal that could bring big fines or even a jail term for the home styles guru known for impeccable taste. (AP Photo/APTN)

45 posted on 06/04/2003 12:05:51 PM PDT by SMEDLEYBUTLER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]


Wed Jun 4, 2:35 PM ET

Martha Stewart (news - web sites) arrives at federal court in New York on June 4, 2003 where she was charged with securities fraud and obstruction of justice, stemming from her sale of shares of ImClone Systems Inc., a biotechnology company run by a close friend. The charges, which could carry penalties of up to 10 years in jail, marked a stunning blow to Stewart. A former stockbroker, Stewart built a catering company into a media and design empire and became a household name while courting a celebrity lifestyle. (Jeff Christensen/Reuters)

46 posted on 06/04/2003 12:08:48 PM PDT by SMEDLEYBUTLER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]


Wed Jun 4,12:44 PM ET

Martha Stewart (news - web sites)(L) arrives at federal court in New York on June 4, 2003 where she was indicted on nine counts including securities fraud and obstruction of justice charges. (Jeff Christensen/Reuters)

47 posted on 06/04/2003 12:10:32 PM PDT by SMEDLEYBUTLER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: camle
I'd just like to focus on my salad.
48 posted on 06/04/2003 12:10:32 PM PDT by lugsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SMEDLEYBUTLER
RE: photos in posts #46, 47...she's lookin' more and more like the Hildabeast every day! Criminal osmosis? OOOH MY EYES! Now where'd I leave my shades? Ahhhh, that's better.
49 posted on 06/04/2003 12:53:08 PM PDT by Xthe17th (FREE THE STATES. Repudiate the 17th amendment!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: ewing
**Martha is 62!!**

Yes. She looks pretty good for 62, imo.

50 posted on 06/04/2003 3:42:23 PM PDT by homeschool mama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: ewing
There was a Jayson Blair moment on Lou Dobbs' show on CNN a little while ago. A reporter who was commenting on Stewart's perp walk into the court house said something to the effect that Stewart's umbrella was there to protect Stewart from "the driving rain" outside the courthouse.

What driving rain?

51 posted on 06/04/2003 3:46:56 PM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: homeschool mama
Stupid question, but what does IMO stand for? I see it here all the time.
52 posted on 06/04/2003 3:47:35 PM PDT by Fraulein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Fraulein
There's no such thing as a stupid question. :o)

IMO = in my opinion

IMHO = in my humble opinion

IIRC = if i recall correctly (new one for me)

53 posted on 06/04/2003 4:05:41 PM PDT by homeschool mama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: homeschool mama
Thank you! :)
54 posted on 06/04/2003 4:10:12 PM PDT by Fraulein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
Typical CNN reportage!
55 posted on 06/04/2003 5:44:18 PM PDT by ewing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson