To: windchime
I still remember him in the OJ trial demonstrating the 'BLUH SPATTR EWIDUNCE" Crap it was terrible. But that was One dumb Jury. Hopefully, some intelligent people can be gathered this time. I think the Guy is WAAY overpaid for his Testimony.
178 posted on
06/03/2003 3:48:01 PM PDT by
Canadian Outrage
(All us Western Canuks belong South)
To: Canadian Outrage; cyncooper
He's made up that newspaper wrapped around Conner story out of thin air. He has said, "someone need to examine baby skin, find paper residue."
Excuse me? Lord knows I'm no forensic pathologist, but wouldn't any paper residue - if it even existed - have been washed off of the baby's skin during the time in the water?
To: Canadian Outrage
'BLUH SPATTR EWIDUNCE LOL, SOB, LOL, SOB
To: Canadian Outrage
But that was One dumb Jury.Not dumb, imo. Just intending to acquit, period.
The defense offered up a buffet of "reasonable doubt" (which it was not, since to be reasonable, it must be fact-based) from which to choose as their excuse for the verdict.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson