To: Mo1
They couldn't have gotten them from Saddam, because he didn't have any WMD, right? Isn't that what the anti-war crowd has been telling us?
To: FairOpinion
I have always suspected that the reason why the gov't hasn't shown all of the evidence about the WMD, is because Iraq is teeming with terrorists, who either got to the weapons already, or are still hunting them down. Just my opinion.
49 posted on
06/02/2003 10:26:38 PM PDT by
Pan_Yans Wife
(Lurking since 2000.)
To: FairOpinion
They couldn't have gotten them from Saddam, because he didn't have any WMD, right? Isn't that what the anti-war crowd has been telling us?
Well, one of the reasons to attack was to keep them out of enemy hands. If WMD did come from Iraq, then the war has at least one horrible failure.
93 posted on
06/02/2003 11:01:08 PM PDT by
KCmark
(I am NOT a partisan.)
To: FairOpinion
They couldn't have gotten them from Saddam, because he didn't have any WMD, right? Isn't that what the anti-war crowd has been telling us?That's what the democrats and anti-war crowd are STILL telling us.......
230 posted on
06/03/2003 5:36:53 AM PDT by
b4its2late
(My mind not only wanders, sometimes it leaves completely.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson